BeastCompare

13 Pro 5G vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Realme · 2024

13 Pro 5G

13 Pro 5G
83/ 100
Launch price$300
Motorola · 2024

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
84/ 100
Launch price$1,099
Head-to-head

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins 4 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

13 Pro 5G
13 Pro 5G
3 wins
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
4 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
13 Pro 5GMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • Speed13 Pro 5G
    95
    90
  • CameraMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    84
    88
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    60
    88
  • Battery13 Pro 5G
    86
    70
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    62
    100
  • ConnectivityMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    0
    100
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • Value13 Pro 5G
    90
    55
Key differences
  • 13 Pro 5G has the bigger battery5,200 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.7"
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is lighter189 g vs 192 g
  • 13 Pro 5G launched cheaper$300 vs $1,099
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP
  • 13 Pro 5G has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy 13 Pro 5G
  • ✓$799 cheaper at launch ($300 vs $1,099)
  • ✓Bigger 5,200 mAh battery (+1,200 mAh)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
  • ✓3 g lighter (189 g vs 192 g), easier to hold
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 165 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specification13 Pro 5GMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeNot listedpOLED
Screen Size6.7"6.9"
Resolution & DensityN/A 2640x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh RateNot listed165 Hz
BrightnessN/A3,000 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 13 Pro 5G Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon (45nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsUnknown mobile GPUAdreno 735
Operating SystemAndroid Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB / 256GB / 512GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP50 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony LYT-700C
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/A50 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens16 MP32 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A171.3 x 74 x 7.1 mm
Weight192 g189 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP48
8. Battery & Charging🏆 13 Pro 5G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,200 mAh4,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A45W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed15W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 7
BluetoothNot listed5.4
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$300$1,099
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins — BeastScore 84.0/100

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.7") and lighter body (189 g vs 192 g). The 13 Pro 5G is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (5,200 mAh vs 4,000 mAh).

Buy 13 Pro 5G if you want

Larger battery: 5,200 mAh vs 4,000 mAh · More RAM: 16 GB vs 12 GB

Buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Common questions

Which is better: 13 Pro 5G or Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.7") and lighter body (189 g vs 192 g). The 13 Pro 5G is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (5,200 mAh vs 4,000 mAh). BeastScore: 13 Pro 5G 83.4/100, Motorola Razr 50 Ultra 84.0/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between 13 Pro 5G and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

13 Pro 5G has a 6.7-inch display and 5200 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 4000 mAh battery.

How do 13 Pro 5G and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra compare for speed?

13 Pro 5G scores 95/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 50 Ultra scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy S26
Samsung

Galaxy S26

iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple

iPhone 17 Pro Max

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite 5G
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite 5G

Xiaomi Poco X8 Power 5G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Poco X8 Power 5G

vivo V80 Lite 5G (India)
Vivo

vivo V80 Lite 5G (India)

Oppo A6
Oppo

Oppo A6

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

13 Pro 5G vs Realme 16 Pro 5G

Compare →
vs

13 Pro 5G vs Realme 15 Pro 5G

Compare →
vs

Realme 9 Pro vs 13 Pro 5G

Compare →
vs

Realme 10 Pro vs 13 Pro 5G

Compare →
vs

13 Pro 5G vs 13+ 5G

Compare →
vs

POCO X6 vs 13 Pro 5G

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →

Gear for the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARK
16 min read

Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)

An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.

Read →