BeastCompare

ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition vs Vivo X300 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Vivo X300 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.2/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Asus · 2026

ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition

ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition
92/ 100
Launch price$1,599
Vivo · 2026

Vivo X300 Ultra

Vivo X300 Ultra
92/ 100
Launch price$1,992
Head-to-head

Vivo X300 Ultra wins 4 of 8 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition
ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition
1 win
Vivo X300 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra
4 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro EditionVivo X300 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    95
    95
  • CameraVivo X300 Ultra
    91
    100
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieVivo X300 Ultra
    88
    100
  • BatteryVivo X300 Ultra
    98
    100
  • DisplayASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition
    100
    90
  • ConnectivityVivo X300 Ultra
    95
    100
  • SecurityTie
    100
    100
  • ValueTie
    55
    55
Key differences
  • Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery6,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
  • Vivo X300 Ultra charges faster100W vs 80W
  • Vivo X300 Ultra has a sharper main camera200 MP vs 50 MP
  • ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition has a smoother screen185 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition is lighter230 g vs 235 g
  • ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition launched cheaper$1,599 vs $1,992
  • Vivo X300 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP
  • Vivo X300 Ultra has newer Bluetooth6 vs 5.4
  • ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition has more RAM24 GB vs 16 GB
  • Vivo X300 Ultra is better protected from water and dustIP69 vs IP68
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition
  • ✓5 g lighter (230 g vs 235 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$393 cheaper at launch ($1,599 vs $1,992)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
Reasons to buy Vivo X300 Ultra
  • ✓Bigger 6,600 mAh battery (+600 mAh)
  • ✓200 MP main camera
  • ✓6.82" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro EditionVivo X300 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition Wins Display
Screen typeLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Screen Size6.82"6.82"
Resolution & Density2400x1080 (388 ppi)3168x1440 (510 ppi)
Refresh Rate185 Hz adaptive120 Hz adaptive
Brightness2,500 nits peak4,500 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm)Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 840Adreno 840
Operating SystemAndroid 16Android 16
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory24 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage1024GB256GB / 512GB / 1024GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Vivo X300 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, Sony LYT-700200 MP, f/1.6, OIS, Sony LYT-901
Telephoto Zoom32 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4200 MP (3.7x optical zoom), f/2.5, OIS
Ultrawide Camera13 MP, f/2.250 MP, f/2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/2.550 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition Lightest Chassis
Dimensions163.8 x 76.8 x 9 mm163.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm
Weight230 g235 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68IP69
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Vivo X300 Ultra Wins Battery
Battery Capacity6,000 mAh6,600 mAh
Wired Fast Charging80W wired fast charging100W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging15W wireless charging40W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,599$1,992
Our verdict

Vivo X300 Ultra wins — BeastScore 92.2/100

The Vivo X300 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh) and faster charging (100W vs 80W). The ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (185 Hz vs 120 Hz).

Buy ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition if you want

Smoother display: 185 Hz vs 120 Hz · More RAM: 24 GB vs 16 GB

Buy Vivo X300 Ultra if you want

Larger battery: 6,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh · Faster wired charging: 100W vs 80W

Common questions

Which is better: ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition or Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh) and faster charging (100W vs 80W). The ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (185 Hz vs 120 Hz). BeastScore: ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition 91.6/100, Vivo X300 Ultra 92.2/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition and Vivo X300 Ultra?

ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition has a 6.82-inch display and 6000 mAh battery. Vivo X300 Ultra has a 6.82-inch display and 6600 mAh battery.

How do ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition and Vivo X300 Ultra compare for speed?

ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition scores 95/100 for performance; Vivo X300 Ultra scores 95/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy Z Fold8
Samsung

Galaxy Z Fold8

Apple iPhone Duo
Apple

Apple iPhone Duo

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google

Google Pixel 9 Pro

OnePlus 12R
Oneplus

OnePlus 12R

Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Xiaomi

Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Vivo X300s
Vivo

Vivo X300s

Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Oppo

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Motorola Edge 70 Pro+ 5G
Motorola

Motorola Edge 70 Pro+ 5G

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra

Compare →
vs

ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition vs iPhone 18 Pro Max

Compare →
vs

ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition vs Sony Xperia 1 VII

Compare →
vs

Oppo Find X9 Ultra vs ASUS ROG Phone 10 Pro Edition

Compare →
vs

vivo X200 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Vivo X300 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Vivo X300 Ultra vs Vivo X300s

Compare →
vs

Vivo X300 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro

Compare →

Gear for the Vivo X300 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We compared the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →
TP-Link Deco BE85 vs. ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro vs. Netgear Orbi 970 vs. Amazon eero Max 7: The Definitive Flagship WiFi 7 Mesh & Gaming Router Architecture, 320MHz Channels, 4K-QAM, Multi-Link Operation (MLO), 10Gbps Multi-Gig WAN/LAN, Broadcom vs. Qualcomm Silicon, and Real-World Latency Showdown (2026)Flagship WiFi 7 Shootout
18 min read

TP-Link Deco BE85 vs. ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro vs. Netgear Orbi 970 vs. Amazon eero Max 7: The Definitive Flagship WiFi 7 Mesh & Gaming Router Architecture, 320MHz Channels, 4K-QAM, Multi-Link Operation (MLO), 10Gbps Multi-Gig WAN/LAN, Broadcom vs. Qualcomm Silicon, and Real-World Latency Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural and benchmark breakdown of the top 4 flagship WiFi 7 networking systems—analyzing 320MHz channel bonding, Multi-Link Operation (MLO) aggregation, Broadcom BCM4916 vs. Qualcomm Networking Pro 1220/1620 processors, 10GbE backhaul throughput, and ultra-low jitter VR/gaming performance.

Read →