BeastCompare

ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming: Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming edges ahead with a BeastScore of 90.1/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Asus · 2024

ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra

ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra
90/ 100
Launch price$899
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
90/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra
ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra
2 wins
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
ASUS Zenfone 11 UltraXiaomi Black Shark Gaming
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedXiaomi Black Shark Gaming
    90
    95
  • CameraASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra
    91
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryXiaomi Black Shark Gaming
    94
    95
  • DisplayASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra
    96
    94
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueXiaomi Black Shark Gaming
    68
    85
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming has the bigger battery7,300 mAh vs 5,500 mAh
  • ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra has a smoother screen144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming has the bigger screen8.8" vs 6.78"
  • ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.78" display at 144 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
  • ✓Bigger 7,300 mAh battery (+1,800 mAh)
  • ✓8.8" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationASUS Zenfone 11 UltraXiaomi Black Shark Gaming
1. Display & Screen🏆 ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.78"8.8"
Resolution & Density2400x1080 (391 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate144 Hz120 Hz
Brightness2,500 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 750Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB256 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, Sony IMX890undefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto Zoom32 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera13 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens12 MP, f/2.45undefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
Dimensions163.8 x 76.8 x 8.9 mmN/A
Weight224 gN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,500 mAh7,300 mAh
Wired Fast Charging65W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless Charging15W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Not listed
Bluetooth5.4Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2Not listed
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$899Price on request
Our verdict

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming wins — BeastScore 90.1/100

The Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,300 mAh vs 5,500 mAh) and bigger screen (8.8" vs 6.78"). The ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).

Buy ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra if you want

Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens) · Smoother display: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming if you want

Larger battery: 7,300 mAh vs 5,500 mAh · Larger display: 8.8" vs 6.78"

Common questions

Which is better: ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra or Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming?

The Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,300 mAh vs 5,500 mAh) and bigger screen (8.8" vs 6.78"). The ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). BeastScore: ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra 90.0/100, Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming 90.1/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra and Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming?

ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra has a 6.78-inch display and 5500 mAh battery. Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming has a 8.8-inch display and 7300 mAh battery.

How do ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra and Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming compare for speed?

ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra scores 90/100 for performance; Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming scores 95/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro

Apple iPhone 18 Pro
Apple

Apple iPhone 18 Pro

Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G

OnePlus Pad 3 Pro
Oneplus

OnePlus Pad 3 Pro

Xiaomi 18 Pro
Xiaomi

Xiaomi 18 Pro

vivo IQOO Pad5c
Vivo

vivo IQOO Pad5c

Oppo Find N6 5G
Oppo

Oppo Find N6 5G

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra vs Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra

Compare →
vs

ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15

Compare →
vs

ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi 14

Compare →
vs

ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra vs iPhone 16 Plus

Compare →
vs

ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming vs Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro

Compare →
vs

ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 18 Pro

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming vs Apple iPhone 18 Pro

Compare →

Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We compared the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →