BBK Vivo iQOO Z6 2022 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB I2127 (BBK 2127) vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 74.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins 3 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedMotorola Razr 40 Ultra7280
- CameraMotorola Razr 40 Ultra6072
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryBBK Vivo iQOO Z6 2022 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB I2127 (BBK 2127)8658
- DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra6296
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueBBK Vivo iQOO Z6 2022 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB I2127 (BBK 2127)6855
- BBK Vivo iQOO Z6 2022 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB I2127 (BBK 2127) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.58"
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is lighter184.5 g vs 185 g
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins — BeastScore 74.3/100
After comparing all the specs, Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 69.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.
Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,200 mAh more)
Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 69.4 · Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W
Common questions
Which is better: BBK Vivo iQOO Z6 2022 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB I2127 (BBK 2127) or Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads with an overall BeastScore of 74.3/100 compared to BBK Vivo iQOO Z6 2022 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB I2127 (BBK 2127) (69.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 69.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.
What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo iQOO Z6 2022 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB I2127 (BBK 2127) and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?
BBK Vivo iQOO Z6 2022 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB I2127 (BBK 2127) has a 6.58-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery.
How do BBK Vivo iQOO Z6 2022 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB I2127 (BBK 2127) and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra compare for speed?
BBK Vivo iQOO Z6 2022 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB I2127 (BBK 2127) scores 72/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

iPhone 14 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)

OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)

Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)

BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)

Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
More Smartphones comparisons
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
BBK Vivo iQOO Z6 2022 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB I2127 (BBK 2127) vs Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
BBK Vivo iQOO Z6 2022 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB I2127 (BBK 2127) vs iPhone 14 Plus
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro
BBK Vivo iQOO Z6 2022 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB I2127 (BBK 2127) vs Pixel 6a
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)
Related articles
All articles →
Hardware PickExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?
ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.
Read →
Lab Tested · Monitor Architecture ShowdownASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)
We benchmarked the top 32-inch 4K 240Hz OLED gaming monitors across Gen 3 QD-OLED color volume, LG Micro Lens Array (MLA+) WOLED dual-mode 480Hz switching, sub-pixel text fringing, thermal dissipation heatsinks, DisplayPort 1.4 DSC vs HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, and 3-year burn-in warranties.
Read →
Flagship Projector ShootoutHisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.
Read →