BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) vs Galaxy S21 FE
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419)
Galaxy S21 FE
WHY IS BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) BETTER THAN Galaxy S21 FE?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | BBK Vivo | Galaxy S21 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,700 mAh | 4,500 mAh | +5,700 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | 25W | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | 12 MP | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.31" | 6.4" | 6.4" |
| Chassis Weight | 187g | 177g | 177g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 76.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) vs Galaxy S21 FE
Which is better: BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) or Galaxy S21 FE?
BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) leads with an overall BeastScore of 76.4/100 compared to Galaxy S21 FE (76.3/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 76.4 vs top rival 76.3 and Larger battery capacity: 5,700 mAh (+1,200 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) and Galaxy S21 FE?
BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) is equipped with a 6.31-inch display and 5700 mAh battery, while Galaxy S21 FE features a 6.4-inch display and 4500 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) and Galaxy S21 FE?
In objective hardware benchmarks, BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) achieves a 95/100 performance score, while Galaxy S21 FE scores 72/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Galaxy A06
iPhone 16 Plus
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB GM66V (Google Rango)
Open
Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)
BBK vivo X100 Ultra 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2366GA (BBK V2366)
Oppo Find X8 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2659 (BBK 2659)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones Battles
Galaxy S21 FE vs Galaxy S24 FE
Galaxy S21 FE vs Galaxy S23 FE
BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) vs Galaxy A06
Galaxy S21 FE vs Galaxy A06
BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) vs iPhone 16 Plus
Galaxy S21 FE vs iPhone 16 Plus
BBK Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V1 512GB V2419A (BBK V2419) vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB GM66V (Google Rango)
Galaxy S21 FE vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB GM66V (Google Rango)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Hardware PickExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?
ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.
Lab Tested · Monitor Architecture ShowdownASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)
We benchmarked the top 32-inch 4K 240Hz OLED gaming monitors across Gen 3 QD-OLED color volume, LG Micro Lens Array (MLA+) WOLED dual-mode 480Hz switching, sub-pixel text fringing, thermal dissipation heatsinks, DisplayPort 1.4 DSC vs HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, and 3-year burn-in warranties.
2026 COMPACT FLAGSHIP BENCHMARKSApple iPhone 16 Pro vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: The Definitive Flagship Compact Smartphone Architecture, 6.3-inch 120Hz LTPO Super Actua & ProMotion Displays, Apple A18 Pro vs. Google Tensor G4 vs. Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Silicon, 5x Periscope Telephoto Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, On-Device Gemini Nano & Apple Intelligence, and Real-World Battery Showdown (2026)
A comprehensive 2,500+ word engineering analysis, thermal dissipation benchmark, camera sensor breakdown, and battery endurance comparison of the premier 6.2-to-6.3-inch pro smartphones.