BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) vs Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary): Which One Should You Buy?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 69.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2024

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
69/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi · 2022

Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)

Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)
69/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) wins 0 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
0 wins
Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)
Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    72
    72
  • CameraTie
    60
    60
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    86
    86
  • DisplayTie
    62
    62
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    68
    68
Key differences
  • BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) has the bigger screen6.56" vs 6.43"
  • Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary) is lighter178.8 g vs 185 g
  • BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) has the faster chipMediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835T vs MediaTek Helio G90T MT6785V/CC
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
  • ✓6.56" display
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)
  • ✓6.199999999999989 g lighter (178.8 g), easier to hold
  • ✓6.43" display

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationBBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeColor IPS TFT LCD displayAM-OLED display
Screen Size6.56"6.43"
Resolution & Density720x1612 (269 ppi)1080x2400 (409 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835T (6nm)MediaTek Helio G90T MT6785V/CC (12nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsARM Mali-G57MP2ARM Mali-G76MC4
Operating SystemAndroid Android 12
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory6 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB128GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary CameraN/AN/A
Telephoto ZoomNot listedNot listed
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNot listedNot listed
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/AN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight185 g178.8 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
BluetoothNot listed5.0, A2DP, LE
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) wins — BeastScore 69.4/100

After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.

Buy BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) if you want

Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support

Buy Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary) if you want

Balanced specifications with Xiaomi hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support

Common questions

Which is better: BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) or Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) leads with an overall BeastScore of 69.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary) (69.4/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.

What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) and Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary)?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) has a 6.56-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary) has a 6.43-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) and Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary) compare for speed?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) scores 72/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco M5s Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2207117BPG (Xiaomi Rosemary) scores 72/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
ExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?Hardware Pick
9 min read

ExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?

ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)Lab Tested · Monitor Architecture Showdown
18 min read

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)

We benchmarked the top 32-inch 4K 240Hz OLED gaming monitors across Gen 3 QD-OLED color volume, LG Micro Lens Array (MLA+) WOLED dual-mode 480Hz switching, sub-pixel text fringing, thermal dissipation heatsinks, DisplayPort 1.4 DSC vs HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, and 3-year burn-in warranties.

Read →