BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet): Which One Should You Buy?
BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 73.9/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)
BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedGoogle Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)9095
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryBBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)8678
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,650 mAh
- BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) has the bigger screen6.64" vs 6.3"
- BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) is lighter190 g vs 257 g
- Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet) has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
- Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet) has the faster chipGoogle Tensor G4 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 MT6855
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) wins — BeastScore 73.9/100
After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 73.9 vs top rival 73.5 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+350 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 73.9 vs top rival 73.5 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+350 mAh more)
Significantly faster wired charging: 45W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 48 MP vs max 0 MP
Common questions
Which is better: BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) or Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)?
BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) leads with an overall BeastScore of 73.9/100 compared to Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet) (73.5/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 73.9 vs top rival 73.5 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+350 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)?
BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) has a 6.64-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet) has a 6.3-inch display and 4650 mAh battery.
How do BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet) compare for speed?
BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) scores 90/100 for performance; Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet) scores 95/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
iPhone 14 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)
OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)
Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)
BBK Vivo Y36 5G 2023 Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2318A / Y36m (BBK V2318A)
Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) vs BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)
BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) vs BBK Vivo Y78t 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2312BA (BBK V2312)
BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet) vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) vs iPhone 14 Pro
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet) vs iPhone 14 Pro
BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) vs Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet) vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB GGH2X (Google Comet)
Related articles
All articles →
Hardware PickExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?
ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.
Read →
Lab Tested · Monitor Architecture ShowdownASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)
We benchmarked the top 32-inch 4K 240Hz OLED gaming monitors across Gen 3 QD-OLED color volume, LG Micro Lens Array (MLA+) WOLED dual-mode 480Hz switching, sub-pixel text fringing, thermal dissipation heatsinks, DisplayPort 1.4 DSC vs HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, and 3-year burn-in warranties.
Read →
Flagship Projector ShootoutHisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.
Read →