BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) vs iPhone 13 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?
BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)
iPhone 13 Pro
BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) wins 3 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedBBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)8072
- CameraiPhone 13 Pro6075
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryBBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)8658
- DisplayiPhone 13 Pro6286
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueBBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)6855
- BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 3,095 mAh
- BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) has the bigger screen6.78" vs 6.1"
- BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) is lighter177 g vs 203 g
- BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
- iPhone 13 Pro has the faster chipApple A15 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 MT6855
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) wins — BeastScore 71.4/100
After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 71.0 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,905 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 71.0 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,905 mAh more)
Significantly faster wired charging: 20W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 12 MP vs max 0 MP
Common questions
Which is better: BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) or iPhone 13 Pro?
BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to iPhone 13 Pro (71.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 71.0 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,905 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) and iPhone 13 Pro?
BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) has a 6.78-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. iPhone 13 Pro has a 6.1-inch display and 3095 mAh battery.
How do BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) and iPhone 13 Pro compare for speed?
BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) scores 80/100 for performance; iPhone 13 Pro scores 72/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
iPhone 16
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
OnePlus Nord 3 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2491 (BBK Vitamin)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
BBK Vivo Y35+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2279A / Y35m+ (BBK V2279BA) vs BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A)
BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) vs BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)
BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) vs BBK Vivo Y78t 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2312BA (BBK V2312)
iPhone 13 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro
iPhone 13 Pro vs iPhone 14 Pro
BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
iPhone 13 Pro vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
BBK Vivo Y78+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2271A (BBK V2271A) vs iPhone 16
Related articles
All articles →
CameraOppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate
Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →