Fujitsu Arrows Alpha vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+: Which One Should You Buy?
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ edges ahead with a BeastScore of 87.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Fujitsu Arrows Alpha
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ wins 2 of 3 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. "From specs" scores compare only the specs both phones list. How we score
- Speedfrom specsFujitsu Arrows Alpha8066
- CameraNot enough data
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatterySamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+5695
- DisplaySamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+5394
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueNot enough data
- Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ has the bigger battery10,090 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Fujitsu Arrows Alpha has a smoother screen144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ has the bigger screen12.4" vs 6.38"
- Fujitsu Arrows Alpha has the faster chipMediaTek Dimensity 8350 MT6897 vs Exynos 1380
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ wins — BeastScore 87.4/100
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (10,090 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (12.4" vs 6.38"). The Fujitsu Arrows Alpha is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Smoother display: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
Larger battery: 10,090 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · Larger display: 12.4" vs 6.38"
Common questions
Which is better: Fujitsu Arrows Alpha or Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+?
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (10,090 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (12.4" vs 6.38"). The Fujitsu Arrows Alpha is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). BeastScore: Fujitsu Arrows Alpha 87.0/100, Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 87.4/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Fujitsu Arrows Alpha and Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+?
Fujitsu Arrows Alpha has a 6.38-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ has a 12.4-inch display and 10090 mAh battery.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Fujitsu Arrows Alpha vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Fujitsu Arrows Alpha vs Apple iPad Air 13 5G (2026)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ vs Apple iPad Air 13 5G (2026)
Fujitsu Arrows Alpha vs Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ vs Pixel 10 Pro XL
Fujitsu Arrows Alpha vs OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra 5G
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ vs OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra 5G
Related articles
All articles →
Flagship Camera ShootoutiPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)
An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.
Read →
Hardware Deep DiveApple iPad Pro M4 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra vs. Microsoft Surface Pro 11: The Definitive Flagship OLED Tablet & 2-in-1 Architecture, Tandem OLED, NPU Silicon, Stylus Latency, and Desktop OS Convergence Showdown (2026)
We compare Apple's 3nm Tandem OLED powerhouse, Samsung's 14.6-inch Dimensity 9300+ anti-reflective slate, and Microsoft's Snapdragon X Elite Copilot+ PC across Geekbench 6, Cinebench 2024, stylus latency, thermal throttling, battery life, and real-world desktop multitasking.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →