GT 6 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

GT 6 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 83.6/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Realme · 2023

GT 6

GT 6
84/ 100
Launch price$380
Motorola · 2024

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
84/ 100
Launch price$1,099
Head-to-head

GT 6 wins 4 of 8 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

GT 6
GT 6
4 wins
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
GT 6Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGT 6
    95
    90
  • CameraMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    84
    88
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieTie
    88
    88
  • BatteryGT 6
    92
    70
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    62
    100
  • ConnectivityMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    70
    83
  • SecurityGT 6
    57
    14
  • ValueGT 6
    80
    55
Key differences
  • GT 6 has the bigger battery5,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • GT 6 charges faster120W vs 45W
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.78"
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is lighter189 g vs 191 g
  • GT 6 launched cheaper$380 vs $1,099
  • GT 6 has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • GT 6 is better protected from water and dustIP65 vs IP48
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy GT 6
  • ✓$719 cheaper at launch ($380 vs $1,099)
  • ✓Bigger 5,500 mAh battery (+1,500 mAh)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
  • ✓2 g lighter (189 g vs 191 g), easier to hold
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 165 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGT 6Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDpOLED
Screen Size6.78"6.9"
Resolution & Density2780x1264 (450 ppi)2640x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz165 Hz
Brightness6,000 nits peak3,000 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 GT 6 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 735Adreno 735
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB / 256GB / 512GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.69, OIS, Sony LYT-80850 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony LYT-700C
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera8 MP, f/2.250 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/2.432 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Lightest Chassis
Dimensions161.5 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm171.3 x 74 x 7.1 mm
Weight191 g189 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP65IP48
8. Battery & Charging🏆 GT 6 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,500 mAh4,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging120W wired fast charging45W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed15W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$380$1,099
Our verdict

GT 6 wins — BeastScore 83.6/100

The GT 6 is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (5,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh) and faster charging (120W vs 45W). The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).

Buy GT 6 if you want

Larger battery: 5,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh · Faster wired charging: 120W vs 45W

Buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra if you want

Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz

Common questions

Which is better: GT 6 or Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

The GT 6 is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (5,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh) and faster charging (120W vs 45W). The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). BeastScore: GT 6 83.6/100, Motorola Razr 50 Ultra 84.0/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between GT 6 and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

GT 6 has a 6.78-inch display and 5500 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 4000 mAh battery.

How do GT 6 and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra compare for speed?

GT 6 scores 95/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 50 Ultra scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the GT 6

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARK
16 min read

Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)

An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.

Read →