BeastCompare

GT 7 Pro vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

GT 7 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Realme · 2024

GT 7 Pro

GT 7 Pro
84/ 100
Launch price$470
Motorola · 2024

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
84/ 100
Launch price$1,099
Head-to-head

GT 7 Pro wins 4 of 8 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

GT 7 Pro
GT 7 Pro
4 wins
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
GT 7 ProMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGT 7 Pro
    95
    90
  • CameraMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    84
    88
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    60
    88
  • BatteryGT 7 Pro
    96
    70
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    62
    100
  • ConnectivityTie
    83
    83
  • SecurityGT 7 Pro
    100
    14
  • ValueGT 7 Pro
    80
    55
Key differences
  • GT 7 Pro has the bigger battery6,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • GT 7 Pro charges faster120W vs 45W
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.78"
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is lighter189 g vs 222.8 g
  • GT 7 Pro launched cheaper$470 vs $1,099
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP
  • GT 7 Pro has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • GT 7 Pro has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  • GT 7 Pro is better protected from water and dustIP68 vs IP48
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy GT 7 Pro
  • ✓$629 cheaper at launch ($470 vs $1,099)
  • ✓Bigger 6,500 mAh battery (+2,500 mAh)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
  • ✓33.80000000000001 g lighter (189 g vs 222.8 g), easier to hold
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 165 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGT 7 ProMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeLTPO AMOLEDpOLED
Screen Size6.78"6.9"
Resolution & Density2780x1264 (450 ppi)2640x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz adaptive165 Hz
Brightness6,500 nits peak3,000 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 GT 7 Pro Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Elite (3nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 830Adreno 735
Operating SystemAndroid 15Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB / 256GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.6, OIS, Sony LYT-81850 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony LYT-700C
Telephoto Zoom50 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.65, OISNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera8 MP, f/2.250 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens16 MP, f/2.532 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Lightest Chassis
Dimensions162.5 x 76 x 8.55 mm171.3 x 74 x 7.1 mm
Weight222.8 g189 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68/IP69IP48
8. Battery & Charging🏆 GT 7 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity6,500 mAh4,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging120W wired fast charging45W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed15W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$470$1,099
Our verdict

GT 7 Pro wins — BeastScore 84.4/100

The GT 7 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh) and faster charging (120W vs 45W). The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).

Buy GT 7 Pro if you want

Larger battery: 6,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh · Faster wired charging: 120W vs 45W

Buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra if you want

Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz · Lighter: 189 g vs 222.8 g (34 g less)

Common questions

Which is better: GT 7 Pro or Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

The GT 7 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh) and faster charging (120W vs 45W). The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). BeastScore: GT 7 Pro 84.4/100, Motorola Razr 50 Ultra 84.0/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between GT 7 Pro and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

GT 7 Pro has a 6.78-inch display and 6500 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 4000 mAh battery.

How do GT 7 Pro and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra compare for speed?

GT 7 Pro scores 95/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 50 Ultra scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy S26
Samsung

Galaxy S26

iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple

iPhone 17 Pro Max

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite 5G
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite 5G

Xiaomi Poco X8 Power 5G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Poco X8 Power 5G

vivo V80 Lite 5G (India)
Vivo

vivo V80 Lite 5G (India)

Oppo A6
Oppo

Oppo A6

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

GT 7 Pro vs Realme GT 8 Pro

Compare →
vs

realme GT 2 Pro vs GT 7 Pro

Compare →
vs

realme GT 5 Pro vs GT 7 Pro

Compare →
vs

GT 7 Pro vs GT 7

Compare →
vs

GT 7 Pro vs POCO F6

Compare →
vs

GT 7 Pro vs Galaxy A55 5G

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →

Gear for the GT 7 Pro

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARK
16 min read

Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)

An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.

Read →