HMD Vibe2 Pro vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
HMD · 2026

HMD Vibe2 Pro

HMD Vibe2 Pro
84/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Motorola · 2024

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
84/ 100
Launch price$1,099
Head-to-head

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

HMD Vibe2 Pro
HMD Vibe2 Pro
1 win
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplay
HMD Vibe2 ProMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. "From specs" scores compare only the specs both phones list. How we score

  • Speedfrom specsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    57
    87
  • Camerafrom specsTie
    83
    83
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    60
    88
  • Batteryfrom specsHMD Vibe2 Pro
    80
    37
  • Displayfrom specsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    66
    92
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueNot enough data
Key differences
  • HMD Vibe2 Pro has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra charges faster45W vs 33W
  • HMD Vibe2 Pro has a sharper main camera64 MP vs 50 MP
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.78"
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is lighter189 g vs 197 g
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy HMD Vibe2 Pro
  • ✓Bigger 6,000 mAh battery (+2,000 mAh)
  • ✓64 MP main camera
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
  • ✓8 g lighter (189 g vs 197 g), easier to hold
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 165 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationHMD Vibe2 ProMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeIPS LCDpOLED
Screen Size6.78"6.9"
Resolution & Density1080x2460 2640x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz165 Hz
BrightnessN/A3,000 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 6300 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedAdreno 735
Operating SystemAndroid 16Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128 GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Camera64 MP50 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony LYT-700C
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/A50 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens13 MP32 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A171.3 x 74 x 7.1 mm
Weight197 g189 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP48
8. Battery & Charging🏆 HMD Vibe2 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity6,000 mAh4,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging33W45W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed15W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 7
BluetoothNot listed5.4
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$1,099
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins — BeastScore 84.0/100

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster charging (45W vs 33W) and smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). The HMD Vibe2 Pro is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh).

Buy HMD Vibe2 Pro if you want

Larger battery: 6,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh · Higher-resolution main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP

Buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra if you want

Faster wired charging: 45W vs 33W · Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz

Common questions

Which is better: HMD Vibe2 Pro or Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster charging (45W vs 33W) and smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). The HMD Vibe2 Pro is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh). BeastScore: HMD Vibe2 Pro 84.0/100, Motorola Razr 50 Ultra 84.0/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between HMD Vibe2 Pro and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

HMD Vibe2 Pro has a 6.78-inch display and 6000 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 4000 mAh battery.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARK
16 min read

Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)

An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.

Read →
Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs. Sony WF-1000XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4: The Definitive Flagship ANC Earbuds Architecture, Custom Acoustic Drivers, Adaptive DSP, FDA Clinical Hearing Aid Validation, Lossless Codecs, and Noise Cancellation Showdown (2026)Definitive Audio Guide 2026
16 min read

Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs. Sony WF-1000XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4: The Definitive Flagship ANC Earbuds Architecture, Custom Acoustic Drivers, Adaptive DSP, FDA Clinical Hearing Aid Validation, Lossless Codecs, and Noise Cancellation Showdown (2026)

We compare the four titans of true wireless audio across low-frequency subway rumble, vocal babble attenuation, clinical hearing aid acoustic profiling, LDAC vs. aptX Lossless throughput, and real-world battery endurance.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →