Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition: Which One Should You Buy?
Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition edges ahead with a BeastScore of 75.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition
Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition wins overall; Motorola Razr 40 Ultra takes 4 of 7 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedMotorola Razr 40 Ultra8072
- CameraRealme C35 2022 Premium Edition7284
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieMotorola Razr 40 Ultra8840
- BatteryRealme C35 2022 Premium Edition5886
- DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra9662
- ConnectivityMotorola Razr 40 Ultra6555
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueRealme C35 2022 Premium Edition5568
- Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra charges faster30W vs 18W
- Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition has a sharper main camera50.1 MP vs 12 MP
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.6"
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is lighter184.5 g vs 189 g
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition wins — BeastScore 75.4/100
The Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 3,800 mAh) and sharper main camera (50.1 MP vs 12 MP). The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its faster charging (30W vs 18W).
Faster wired charging: 30W vs 18W · Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
Larger battery: 5,000 mAh vs 3,800 mAh · Higher-resolution main camera: 50.1 MP vs 12 MP
Common questions
Which is better: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition?
The Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 3,800 mAh) and sharper main camera (50.1 MP vs 12 MP). The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its faster charging (30W vs 18W). BeastScore: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 74.3/100, Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition 75.4/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery. Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition has a 6.6-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition compare for speed?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100 for performance; Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition scores 72/100.
Similar Smartphones
Galaxy A71
iPhone 17e
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 1TB GU0NP (Google Rango)
OnePlus Ace 3V 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJF110 (BBK Audi)
Xiaomi Mi 15T Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 2506BPN68G (Xiaomi Klimt)
V40e
Oppo Find X7 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHZ110 (BBK NVWA)
Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
More Smartphones comparisons
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Realme C30 2022 Premium Edition vs Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition
Realme C33 2022 Premium Edition vs Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition vs Galaxy A71
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro
Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition vs iPhone 17e
Gear for the Realme C35 2022 Premium Edition
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep DiveIntel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →
FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARKElgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)
An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.
Read →