BeastCompare

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Oppo A5 4G: Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Motorola · 2024

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
84/ 100
Launch price$1,099
Oppo

Oppo A5 4G

Oppo A5 4G
84/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
3 wins
Oppo A5 4G
Oppo A5 4G
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Motorola Razr 50 UltraOppo A5 4G
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    90
    79
  • CameraMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    88
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryOppo A5 4G
    70
    95
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    100
    84
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueOppo A5 4G
    55
    85
Key differences
  • Oppo A5 4G has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.67"
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 165 Hz
Reasons to buy Oppo A5 4G
  • ✓Bigger 6,000 mAh battery (+2,000 mAh)
  • ✓6.67" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationMotorola Razr 50 UltraOppo A5 4G
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typepOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.9"6.67"
Resolution & Density2640x1080 (413 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate165 Hz120 Hz
Brightness3,000 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen1
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 735Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB256 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony LYT-700Cundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/2.4undefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
Dimensions171.3 x 74 x 7.1 mmN/A
Weight189 gN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP48Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Oppo A5 4G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging45W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless Charging15W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Not listed
Bluetooth5.4Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0Not listed
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,099Price on request
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins — BeastScore 84.0/100

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz) and bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.67"). The Oppo A5 4G is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh).

Buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra if you want

Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz · More RAM: 12 GB vs 8 GB

Buy Oppo A5 4G if you want

Larger battery: 6,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh

Common questions

Which is better: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or Oppo A5 4G?

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz) and bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.67"). The Oppo A5 4G is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh). BeastScore: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra 84.0/100, Oppo A5 4G 83.8/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Oppo A5 4G?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 4000 mAh battery. Oppo A5 4G has a 6.67-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.

How do Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Oppo A5 4G compare for speed?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra scores 90/100 for performance; Oppo A5 4G scores 79/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy S26
Samsung

Galaxy S26

iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple

iPhone 17 Pro Max

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite 5G
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite 5G

Xiaomi Poco X8 Power 5G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Poco X8 Power 5G

vivo V80 Lite 5G (India)
Vivo

vivo V80 Lite 5G (India)

Oppo A6
Oppo

Oppo A6

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Flip6 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Oppo A5 4G vs Oppo A6

Compare →
vs

Oppo A3 4G vs Oppo A5 4G

Compare →
vs

Oppo A5 Pro (China) vs Oppo A5 4G

Compare →

Gear for the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open GateCamera
5 min read

Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate

Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.

Read →