BeastCompare

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs vivo T4x: Which One Should You Buy?

These two are too close to call on BeastScore — the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Motorola · 2024

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
84/ 100
Launch price$1,099
Vivo · 2025

vivo T4x

vivo T4x
85/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Too close to call: 3 of 7 categories each

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
3 wins
vivo T4x
vivo T4x
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravivo T4x
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    90
    79
  • CameraMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    88
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • Batteryvivo T4x
    70
    95
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    100
    89
  • ConnectivityTie
    65
    65
  • Securityvivo T4x
    14
    34
  • Valuevivo T4x
    55
    85
Key differences
  • vivo T4x has the bigger battery6,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra charges faster45W vs 44W
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.72"
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is lighter189 g vs 204 g
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Dimensity 7300
  • vivo T4x is better protected from water and dustIP64 vs IP48
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
  • ✓15 g lighter (189 g vs 204 g), easier to hold
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 165 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo T4x
  • ✓Bigger 6,500 mAh battery (+2,500 mAh)
  • ✓6.72" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationMotorola Razr 50 Ultravivo T4x
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typepOLEDIPS LCD
Screen Size6.9"6.72"
Resolution & Density2640x1080 (413 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (393 ppi)
Refresh Rate165 Hz120 Hz
Brightness3,000 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Dimensity 7300
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 735Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB256 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony LYT-700Cundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/2.4undefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Lightest Chassis
Dimensions171.3 x 74 x 7.1 mmN/A
Weight189 g204 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP48IP64
8. Battery & Charging🏆 vivo T4x Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,000 mAh6,500 mAh
Wired Fast Charging45W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless Charging15W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Not listed
Bluetooth5.4v5.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,099Price on request
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and vivo T4x are evenly matched

It's a close call. Pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra for its faster charging (45W vs 44W) and smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz), or the vivo T4x for its bigger battery (6,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh) and better water and dust protection (IP64 vs IP48).

Buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra if you want

Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz · More RAM: 12 GB vs 8 GB

Buy vivo T4x if you want

Larger battery: 6,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh

Common questions

Which is better: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or vivo T4x?

It's a close call. Pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra for its faster charging (45W vs 44W) and smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz), or the vivo T4x for its bigger battery (6,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh) and better water and dust protection (IP64 vs IP48). BeastScore: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra 84.0/100, vivo T4x 84.5/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and vivo T4x?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 4000 mAh battery. vivo T4x has a 6.72-inch display and 6500 mAh battery.

How do Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and vivo T4x compare for speed?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra scores 90/100 for performance; vivo T4x scores 79/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy A57 5G
Samsung

Galaxy A57 5G

iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple

iPhone 17 Pro Max

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G

OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite 5G
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite 5G

Xiaomi Poco X8 Power 5G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Poco X8 Power 5G

vivo V80 Lite 5G (India)
Vivo

vivo V80 Lite 5G (India)

Oppo A6
Oppo

Oppo A6

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Flip6 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

vivo T4x vs vivo T5x 5G

Compare →
vs

vivo T1x 4G vs vivo T4x

Compare →
vs

vivo T3x vs vivo T4x

Compare →

Gear for the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARK
16 min read

Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)

An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.

Read →