BeastCompare

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs vivo X80 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo X80 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Motorola · 2024

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
84/ 100
Launch price$1,099
Vivo · 2022

vivo X80 Pro

vivo X80 Pro
84/ 100
Launch price$1,099
Head-to-head

vivo X80 Pro wins 3 of 8 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
2 wins
vivo X80 Pro
vivo X80 Pro
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravivo X80 Pro
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    90
    90
  • Cameravivo X80 Pro
    88
    91
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieTie
    88
    88
  • Batteryvivo X80 Pro
    70
    80
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    100
    88
  • ConnectivityMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    83
    70
  • Securityvivo X80 Pro
    14
    100
  • ValueTie
    55
    55
Key differences
  • vivo X80 Pro has the bigger battery4,700 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • vivo X80 Pro charges faster80W vs 45W
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.78"
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is lighter189 g vs 219 g
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E
  • vivo X80 Pro is better protected from water and dustIP68 vs IP48
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
  • ✓30 g lighter (189 g vs 219 g), easier to hold
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 165 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo X80 Pro
  • ✓Bigger 4,700 mAh battery (+700 mAh)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationMotorola Razr 50 Ultravivo X80 Pro
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typepOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.9"6.78"
Resolution & Density2640x1080 (413 ppi)3200x1440 (517 ppi)
Refresh Rate165 Hz120 Hz
Brightness3,000 nits peak1,800 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 735Adreno 730
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android 12
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 vivo X80 Pro Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony LYT-700C50 MP, f/1.57, OIS, Samsung GN1
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)12 MP (2x optical zoom), f/1.85, OIS
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/2.248 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/2.432 MP, f/2.45
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Lightest Chassis
Dimensions171.3 x 74 x 7.1 mm164.6 x 75.3 x 9 mm
Weight189 g219 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP48IP68
8. Battery & Charging🏆 vivo X80 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,000 mAh4,700 mAh
Wired Fast Charging45W wired fast charging80W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging15W wireless charging50W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.2
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,099$1,099
Our verdict

vivo X80 Pro wins — BeastScore 84.3/100

The vivo X80 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (4,700 mAh vs 4,000 mAh) and faster charging (80W vs 45W). The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).

Buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra if you want

Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz · Brighter screen: 3,000 nits vs 1,800 nits

Buy vivo X80 Pro if you want

Larger battery: 4,700 mAh vs 4,000 mAh · Faster wired charging: 80W vs 45W

Common questions

Which is better: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or vivo X80 Pro?

The vivo X80 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (4,700 mAh vs 4,000 mAh) and faster charging (80W vs 45W). The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). BeastScore: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra 84.0/100, vivo X80 Pro 84.3/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and vivo X80 Pro?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 4000 mAh battery. vivo X80 Pro has a 6.78-inch display and 4700 mAh battery.

How do Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and vivo X80 Pro compare for speed?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra scores 90/100 for performance; vivo X80 Pro scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy S26
Samsung

Galaxy S26

iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple

iPhone 17 Pro Max

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite 5G
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite 5G

Xiaomi Poco X8 Power 5G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Poco X8 Power 5G

vivo V80 Lite 5G (India)
Vivo

vivo V80 Lite 5G (India)

Oppo A6
Oppo

Oppo A6

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Flip6 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

vivo X80 Pro vs vivo X100 Pro

Compare →
vs

vivo X80 Pro vs vivo X90 Pro

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Galaxy S26

Compare →

Gear for the vivo X80 Pro

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARK
16 min read

Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)

An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.

Read →