Motorola Razr (2019) vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 74.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Motorola Razr (2019)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins 5 of 7 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedMotorola Razr 40 Ultra7280
- CameraMotorola Razr 40 Ultra6872
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieMotorola Razr 40 Ultra4088
- BatteryTie5858
- DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra6296
- ConnectivityMotorola Razr 40 Ultra5375
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie5555
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the bigger battery3,800 mAh vs 2,510 mAh
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra charges faster30W vs 15W
- Motorola Razr (2019) has a sharper main camera16 MP vs 12 MP
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.2"
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is lighter184.5 g vs 205 g
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra launched cheaper$999 vs $1,500
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 5 MP
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
- Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins — BeastScore 74.3/100
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (3,800 mAh vs 2,510 mAh) and faster charging (30W vs 15W). The Motorola Razr (2019) is worth a look if you prefer its sharper main camera (16 MP vs 12 MP).
Reliable all-round performance.
Larger battery: 3,800 mAh vs 2,510 mAh · Faster wired charging: 30W vs 15W
Common questions
Which is better: Motorola Razr (2019) or Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (3,800 mAh vs 2,510 mAh) and faster charging (30W vs 15W). The Motorola Razr (2019) is worth a look if you prefer its sharper main camera (16 MP vs 12 MP). BeastScore: Motorola Razr (2019) 64.5/100, Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 74.3/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Motorola Razr (2019) and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?
Motorola Razr (2019) has a 6.2-inch display and 2510 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery.
How do Motorola Razr (2019) and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra compare for speed?
Motorola Razr (2019) scores 72/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
iPhone 14 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)
OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)
Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)
BBK Vivo Y100i 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2279A (BBK V2279A)
Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)
Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
More Smartphones comparisons
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr (2019) vs Galaxy S9
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
Motorola Razr (2019) vs iPhone 13
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro
Motorola Razr (2019) vs Pixel 3
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)
Gear for the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep DiveIntel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →
FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARKElgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)
An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.
Read →