Nothing Phone (2a) vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?
Nothing Phone (2a) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 85.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Nothing Phone (2a)
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
Nothing Phone (2a) wins 3 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedNothing Phone (2a)8079
- CameraNothing Phone (2a)8880
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro8695
- DisplayXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro8694
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueNothing Phone (2a)9085
- Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has the bigger battery8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has the bigger screen11" vs 6.7"
- Nothing Phone (2a) has the faster chipMediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Helio G100
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Nothing Phone (2a) wins — BeastScore 85.4/100
The Nothing Phone (2a) is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster chip (MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Helio G100). The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh).
Reliable all-round performance.
Larger battery: 8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · Larger display: 11" vs 6.7"
Common questions
Which is better: Nothing Phone (2a) or Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro?
The Nothing Phone (2a) is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster chip (MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Helio G100). The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). BeastScore: Nothing Phone (2a) 85.4/100, Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro 85.3/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Nothing Phone (2a) and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro?
Nothing Phone (2a) has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has a 11-inch display and 8800 mAh battery.
How do Nothing Phone (2a) and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro compare for speed?
Nothing Phone (2a) scores 80/100 for performance; Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro scores 79/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Nothing Phone (2a) vs Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus vs Nothing Phone (2a)
Nothing Phone (2a) vs Nothing Phone (2)
HONOR X9b vs Nothing Phone (2a)
POCO X6 Pro vs Nothing Phone (2a)
Nothing Phone (2a) vs T3 5G
Nothing Phone (2a) vs Galaxy A57 5G
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro vs Galaxy A57 5G
Gear for the Nothing Phone (2a)
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Hardware Deep DiveDJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
A 4-way architectural shootout comparing next-gen 1/1.3-inch HDR sensors, 4nm AI silicon, HB-series optical lens mods, 13.5-stop dynamic range, 8K30 capture, 4-hour battery runtimes, and 1.0-inch gimbal vlogging fidelity.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →
Flagship SSD ShootoutCrucial T705 vs. Samsung 990 PRO vs. WD_BLACK SN850X vs. Kingston FURY Renegade: The Definitive Flagship PCIe 5.0 & Gen 4 NVMe SSD Architecture, Phison E26 vs. Samsung Pascal Silicon, 14,500 MB/s Sequential Throughput, DirectStorage 1.2, Sustained SLC Caching, and Real-World Thermal Throttling Showdown (2026)
We compare and dissect the 2026 flagship NVMe SSD landscape: 12nm Phison PS5026-E26 vs. 8nm Samsung Pascal S4LV008 vs. WD 20-82-20035-B1 controllers, Micron 232-layer vs. Samsung V-NAND V7 TLC, 14,500 MB/s sequential speeds, DirectStorage 1.2 GPU decompression, sustained pSLC write cache endurance, active heatsink thermal dynamics, and real-world gaming IOPS.
Read →