BeastCompare

Oppo A96 (China) vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE: Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 82.6/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Oppo · 2022

Oppo A96 (China)

Oppo A96 (China)
83/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
83/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE wins 2 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Oppo A96 (China)
Oppo A96 (China)
1 win
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Oppo A96 (China)Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedOppo A96 (China)
    86
    70
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
    80
    95
  • DisplayXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
    84
    94
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has the bigger battery6,600 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has the bigger screen10.1" vs 6.43"
  • Oppo A96 (China) has more RAM12 GB vs 6 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Oppo A96 (China)
  • ✓6.43" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
  • ✓Bigger 6,600 mAh battery (+2,100 mAh)
  • ✓10.1" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationOppo A96 (China)Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Wins Display
Screen typeIPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM)AMOLED
Screen Size6.43"10.1"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Oppo A96 (China) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 695 5G Helio G85
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 11Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256 GB128 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight191 gN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,500 mAh6,600 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectNot listed
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HDNot listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGNot listed
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE wins — BeastScore 82.6/100

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 4,500 mAh) and bigger screen (10.1" vs 6.43"). The Oppo A96 (China) is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Buy Oppo A96 (China) if you want

More RAM: 12 GB vs 6 GB

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE if you want

Larger battery: 6,600 mAh vs 4,500 mAh · Larger display: 10.1" vs 6.43"

Common questions

Which is better: Oppo A96 (China) or Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 4,500 mAh) and bigger screen (10.1" vs 6.43"). The Oppo A96 (China) is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 6 GB). BeastScore: Oppo A96 (China) 82.9/100, Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE 82.6/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Oppo A96 (China) and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

Oppo A96 (China) has a 6.43-inch display and 4500 mAh battery. Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has a 10.1-inch display and 6600 mAh battery.

How do Oppo A96 (China) and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE compare for speed?

Oppo A96 (China) scores 86/100 for performance; Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE scores 70/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung

Galaxy A37 5G

Apple iPad mini (2024)
Apple

Apple iPad mini (2024)

Google Pixel 10a 5G
Google

Google Pixel 10a 5G

OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite (India)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite (India)

Xiaomi Redmi 13x 4G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi 13x 4G

vivo Y200 Pro
Vivo

vivo Y200 Pro

A5 Pro
Oppo

A5 Pro

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Oppo A58 (China) vs Oppo A96 (China)

Compare →
vs

Oppo A96 (China) vs Galaxy A37 5G

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Galaxy A37 5G

Compare →
vs

Oppo A96 (China) vs Apple iPad mini (2024)

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Apple iPad mini (2024)

Compare →
vs

Oppo A96 (China) vs Google Pixel 10a 5G

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Google Pixel 10a 5G

Compare →
vs

Oppo A96 (China) vs OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite (India)

Compare →

Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open GateCamera
5 min read

Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate

Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.

Read →
DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
14 min read

DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

A 4-way architectural shootout comparing next-gen 1/1.3-inch HDR sensors, 4nm AI silicon, HB-series optical lens mods, 13.5-stop dynamic range, 8K30 capture, 4-hour battery runtimes, and 1.0-inch gimbal vlogging fidelity.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →