vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G vs vivo X200: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2024

vivo X200

vivo X200
89/ 100
Launch price$849
Head-to-head

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
3 wins
vivo X200
vivo X200
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5Gvivo X200
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • Speedvivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
    95
    90
  • Cameravivo X200
    80
    91
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • Batteryvivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
    95
    94
  • Displayvivo X200
    89
    90
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • Valuevivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
    85
    68
Key differences
  • vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has the bigger battery7,400 mAh vs 5,800 mAh
  • vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has the bigger screen6.85" vs 6.67"
  • vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has more RAM24 GB vs 12 GB
  • vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
  • ✓Bigger 7,400 mAh battery (+1,600 mAh)
  • ✓6.85" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo X200
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.67" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5Gvivo X200
1. Display & Screen🏆 vivo X200 Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Screen Size6.85"6.67"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED 2800x1260 (460 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz adaptive
BrightnessN/A4,500 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (3nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedImmortalis-G925 MC12
Operating SystemAndroid Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory24 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage1024 GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 vivo X200 Wins Camera
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera System50 MP, f/1.57, OIS, Sony LYT-818
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)50 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.57, OIS
Ultrawide CameraN/A50 MP, f/2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MP32 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/A162.9 x 76.7 x 7.99 mm
WeightN/A199 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP68
8. Battery & Charging🏆 vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity7,400 mAh5,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast charging90W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed30W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 7
BluetoothNot listed5.4
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 3.2
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$849
Our verdict

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G wins — BeastScore 89.3/100

The vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,400 mAh vs 5,800 mAh) and bigger screen (6.85" vs 6.67").

Buy vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G if you want

Larger battery: 7,400 mAh vs 5,800 mAh · More RAM: 24 GB vs 12 GB

Buy vivo X200 if you want

Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens)

Common questions

Which is better: vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G or vivo X200?

The vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,400 mAh vs 5,800 mAh) and bigger screen (6.85" vs 6.67"). BeastScore: vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G 89.3/100, vivo X200 88.8/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G and vivo X200?

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has a 6.85-inch display and 7400 mAh battery. vivo X200 has a 6.67-inch display and 5800 mAh battery.

How do vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G and vivo X200 compare for speed?

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G scores 95/100 for performance; vivo X200 scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARK
16 min read

Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)

An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.

Read →