vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G vs Xiaomi 13T Pro: Which One Should You Buy?
vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
Xiaomi 13T Pro
vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G wins 3 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- Speedvivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G9590
- CameraXiaomi 13T Pro8091
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- Batteryvivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G9590
- DisplayXiaomi 13T Pro8996
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- Valuevivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G8568
- vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has the bigger battery7,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Xiaomi 13T Pro has a smoother screen144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has the bigger screen6.85" vs 6.67"
- vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has more RAM24 GB vs 12 GB
- vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G wins — BeastScore 89.3/100
The vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (6.85" vs 6.67"). The Xiaomi 13T Pro is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Larger battery: 7,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · More RAM: 24 GB vs 12 GB
Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens) · Smoother display: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
Common questions
Which is better: vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G or Xiaomi 13T Pro?
The vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (6.85" vs 6.67"). The Xiaomi 13T Pro is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). BeastScore: vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G 89.3/100, Xiaomi 13T Pro 89.2/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G and Xiaomi 13T Pro?
vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has a 6.85-inch display and 7400 mAh battery. Xiaomi 13T Pro has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G and Xiaomi 13T Pro compare for speed?
vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G scores 95/100 for performance; Xiaomi 13T Pro scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
vivo iQOO 15R 5G vs vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G vs vivo iQOO 15T 5G
Xiaomi 13T Pro vs Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G
Xiaomi 13T Pro vs Xiaomi 14T Pro
Xiaomi 11T Pro vs Xiaomi 13T Pro
Xiaomi 12T Pro vs Xiaomi 13T Pro
Xiaomi 13 Pro vs Xiaomi 13T Pro
Xiaomi 13 vs Xiaomi 13T Pro
Gear for the vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep DiveIntel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →
FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARKElgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)
An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.
Read →