BeastCompare

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi · 2025

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G wins 1 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
1 win
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    95
    95
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    95
    95
  • Displayvivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
    89
    84
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has the bigger battery7,400 mAh vs 6,200 mAh
  • vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has the bigger screen6.85" vs 6.67"
  • vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has more RAM24 GB vs 16 GB
  • vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G
  • ✓Bigger 7,400 mAh battery (+1,200 mAh)
  • ✓6.85" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+
  • ✓6.67" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+
1. Display & Screen🏆 vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.85"6.67"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (395 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory24 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage1024 GB512 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/AN/A
WeightN/A180 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP64
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity7,400 mAh6,200 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listedv5.3
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G wins — BeastScore 89.3/100

The vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,400 mAh vs 6,200 mAh) and bigger screen (6.85" vs 6.67").

Buy vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G if you want

Larger battery: 7,400 mAh vs 6,200 mAh · More RAM: 24 GB vs 16 GB

Buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Common questions

Which is better: vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G or Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+?

The vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,400 mAh vs 6,200 mAh) and bigger screen (6.85" vs 6.67"). BeastScore: vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G 89.3/100, Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 88.6/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+?

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G has a 6.85-inch display and 7400 mAh battery. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ has a 6.67-inch display and 6200 mAh battery.

How do vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ compare for speed?

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G scores 95/100 for performance; Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ scores 95/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G

Apple iPhone 18 Pro
Apple

Apple iPhone 18 Pro

Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G

OnePlus 15T 5G
Oneplus

OnePlus 15T 5G

Xiaomi 17 Max 5G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi 17 Max 5G

vivo S60 5G
Vivo

vivo S60 5G

OPPO Find X10
Oppo

OPPO Find X10

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion 5G
Motorola

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion 5G

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

vivo iQOO 15R 5G vs vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G

Compare →
vs

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G vs vivo iQOO 15T 5G

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G (China)

Compare →
vs

Redmi Note 12 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+

Compare →
vs

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+

Compare →

Gear for the vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 5G

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARK
16 min read

Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)

An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.

Read →