Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.6/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Xiaomi

Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G

Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G
87/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi · 2025

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
87/ 100
Launch price$699
Head-to-head

Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G wins 2 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G
Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G
2 wins
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
1 win
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Xiaomi 17T Pro 5GXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
    86
    95
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryXiaomi 17T Pro 5G
    95
    86
  • DisplayXiaomi 17T Pro 5G
    89
    84
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G has the bigger battery7,000 mAh vs 5,300 mAh
  • Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G has the bigger screen6.83" vs 6.67"
  • Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G has the faster chipDimensity 9500 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G
  • ✓Bigger 7,000 mAh battery (+1,700 mAh)
  • ✓6.83" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.67" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationXiaomi 17T Pro 5GXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED CrystalRes
Screen Size6.83"6.67"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (526 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz adaptive
BrightnessN/A3,200 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorDimensity 9500 Snapdragon 8 Elite
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage1024 GB512 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera System50 MP, f/1.6, OIS, Sony IMX906
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)50 MP (2.5x optical zoom), f/2, OIS
Ultrawide CameraN/A32 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MP32 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/A160.3 x 75 x 8.4 mm
WeightN/A212 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP68
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity7,000 mAh5,300 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed50W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 7
BluetoothNot listed5.4
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 3.2
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$699
Our verdict

Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G wins — BeastScore 86.6/100

The Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,000 mAh vs 5,300 mAh) and bigger screen (6.83" vs 6.67").

Buy Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G if you want

Larger battery: 7,000 mAh vs 5,300 mAh

Buy Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra if you want

Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens)

Common questions

Which is better: Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G or Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,000 mAh vs 5,300 mAh) and bigger screen (6.83" vs 6.67"). BeastScore: Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G 86.6/100, Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra 86.8/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra?

Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G has a 6.83-inch display and 7000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra has a 6.67-inch display and 5300 mAh battery.

How do Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra compare for speed?

Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G scores 86/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra scores 95/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARK
16 min read

Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)

An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.

Read →