Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 81.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra

Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
82/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro

Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro
82/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro wins 2 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
1 win
Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro
Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 UltraXiaomi Poco C81 Pro
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedXiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
    79
    70
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryXiaomi Poco C81 Pro
    86
    95
  • DisplayXiaomi Poco C81 Pro
    84
    89
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro has the bigger screen6.9" vs 1.43"
  • Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra has more RAM8 GB vs 4 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
  • ✓1.43" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro
  • ✓Bigger 6,000 mAh battery (+1,000 mAh)
  • ✓6.9" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationXiaomi Black Shark GS3 UltraXiaomi Poco C81 Pro
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size1.43"6.9"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon / MediaTek Unisoc T7250
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR4 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256 GB256 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/AN/A
WeightN/AN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listedNot listed
USB Port & SpeedNot listedNot listed
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro wins — BeastScore 81.8/100

The Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (6.9" vs 1.43"). The Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra if you want

More RAM: 8 GB vs 4 GB

Buy Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro if you want

Larger battery: 6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · Larger display: 6.9" vs 1.43"

Common questions

Which is better: Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra or Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro?

The Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (6.9" vs 1.43"). The Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). BeastScore: Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra 82.0/100, Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro 81.8/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro?

Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra has a 1.43-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro has a 6.9-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.

How do Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro compare for speed?

Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra scores 79/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro scores 70/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)FLAGSHIP 4K WEBCAM BENCHMARK
16 min read

Elgato Facecam Pro vs. Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra vs. Insta360 Link 2 vs. Logitech MX Brio: The Definitive Flagship 4K60 & AI Streaming Webcam Architecture, 1/1.2" Sony STARVIS 2 vs. 1/1.8" STARVIS Sensors, Uncompressed 4K60 YUY2 Pipelines, 2-Axis AI Gimbal PTZ, Hardware HDR, and Real-World Optical Studio Shootout (2026)

An exhaustive hardware, optical sensor, and ISP deep dive comparing the four titans of desktop streaming: Elgato Facecam Pro's uncompressed 4K60 pipeline, Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra's massive 1/1.2-inch STARVIS 2 sensor, Insta360 Link 2's AI motorized 2-axis gimbal, and Logitech MX Brio's workstation ergonomics.

Read →