BeastCompare

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 85.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
85/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi · 2025

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro
85/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro wins 2 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
2 wins
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro
1 win
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro
    79
    86
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
    95
    91
  • DisplayXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
    94
    84
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has the bigger battery8,800 mAh vs 5,500 mAh
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has the bigger screen11" vs 6.67"
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro has the faster chipDimensity 7300 Ultra vs Helio G100
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
  • ✓Bigger 8,800 mAh battery (+3,300 mAh)
  • ✓11" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro
  • ✓6.67" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size11"6.67"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (395 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHelio G100 Dimensity 7300 Ultra
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256 GB512 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/AN/A
WeightN/A180 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP64
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity8,800 mAh5,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listedv5.3
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro wins — BeastScore 85.3/100

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (8,800 mAh vs 5,500 mAh) and bigger screen (11" vs 6.67"). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro if you want

Larger battery: 8,800 mAh vs 5,500 mAh · Larger display: 11" vs 6.67"

Buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro if you want

More RAM: 12 GB vs 8 GB

Common questions

Which is better: Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro or Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro?

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (8,800 mAh vs 5,500 mAh) and bigger screen (11" vs 6.67"). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). BeastScore: Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro 85.3/100, Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 85.1/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro?

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has a 11-inch display and 8800 mAh battery. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro has a 6.67-inch display and 5500 mAh battery.

How do Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro compare for speed?

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro scores 79/100 for performance; Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro scores 86/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy A57 5G
Samsung

Galaxy A57 5G

Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)
Apple

Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G

OnePlus Nord CE5 5G
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord CE5 5G

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G

vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
Vivo

vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro

Oppo A5 Energy
Oppo

Oppo A5 Energy

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (China)

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (China)

Compare →
vs

Redmi Note 12 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro

Compare →
vs

Redmi Note 13 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14S

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro vs Galaxy A57 5G

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro vs Galaxy A57 5G

Compare →

Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
14 min read

DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

A 4-way architectural shootout comparing next-gen 1/1.3-inch HDR sensors, 4nm AI silicon, HB-series optical lens mods, 13.5-stop dynamic range, 8K30 capture, 4-hour battery runtimes, and 1.0-inch gimbal vlogging fidelity.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Crucial T705 vs. Samsung 990 PRO vs. WD_BLACK SN850X vs. Kingston FURY Renegade: The Definitive Flagship PCIe 5.0 & Gen 4 NVMe SSD Architecture, Phison E26 vs. Samsung Pascal Silicon, 14,500 MB/s Sequential Throughput, DirectStorage 1.2, Sustained SLC Caching, and Real-World Thermal Throttling Showdown (2026)Flagship SSD Shootout
15 min read

Crucial T705 vs. Samsung 990 PRO vs. WD_BLACK SN850X vs. Kingston FURY Renegade: The Definitive Flagship PCIe 5.0 & Gen 4 NVMe SSD Architecture, Phison E26 vs. Samsung Pascal Silicon, 14,500 MB/s Sequential Throughput, DirectStorage 1.2, Sustained SLC Caching, and Real-World Thermal Throttling Showdown (2026)

We compare and dissect the 2026 flagship NVMe SSD landscape: 12nm Phison PS5026-E26 vs. 8nm Samsung Pascal S4LV008 vs. WD 20-82-20035-B1 controllers, Micron 232-layer vs. Samsung V-NAND V7 TLC, 14,500 MB/s sequential speeds, DirectStorage 1.2 GPU decompression, sustained pSLC write cache endurance, active heatsink thermal dynamics, and real-world gaming IOPS.

Read →