Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Zenfone 9: Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 82.6/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Zenfone 9
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE wins 3 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedZenfone 97095
- CameraZenfone 98084
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE9570
- DisplayXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE9486
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE8568
- Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has the bigger battery6,600 mAh vs 4,300 mAh
- Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has the bigger screen10.1" vs 5.92"
- Zenfone 9 has more RAM16 GB vs 6 GB
- Zenfone 9 has the faster chipSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs Helio G85
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE wins — BeastScore 82.6/100
The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 4,300 mAh) and bigger screen (10.1" vs 5.92"). The Zenfone 9 is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Larger battery: 6,600 mAh vs 4,300 mAh · Larger display: 10.1" vs 5.92"
More RAM: 16 GB vs 6 GB
Common questions
Which is better: Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE or Zenfone 9?
The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 4,300 mAh) and bigger screen (10.1" vs 5.92"). The Zenfone 9 is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (16 GB vs 6 GB). BeastScore: Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE 82.6/100, Zenfone 9 82.8/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE and Zenfone 9?
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has a 10.1-inch display and 6600 mAh battery. Zenfone 9 has a 5.92-inch display and 4300 mAh battery.
How do Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE and Zenfone 9 compare for speed?
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE scores 70/100 for performance; Zenfone 9 scores 95/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Zenfone 9 vs ASUS Zenfone 10
ASUS ZenFone 8 vs Zenfone 9
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Galaxy A37 5G
Zenfone 9 vs Galaxy A37 5G
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Apple iPad mini (2024)
Zenfone 9 vs Apple iPad mini (2024)
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Google Pixel 10a 5G
Zenfone 9 vs Google Pixel 10a 5G
Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →
Prosumer NAS Flagship ShootoutUGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)
We compared the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.
Read →
Flagship WiFi 7 ShootoutTP-Link Deco BE85 vs. ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro vs. Netgear Orbi 970 vs. Amazon eero Max 7: The Definitive Flagship WiFi 7 Mesh & Gaming Router Architecture, 320MHz Channels, 4K-QAM, Multi-Link Operation (MLO), 10Gbps Multi-Gig WAN/LAN, Broadcom vs. Qualcomm Silicon, and Real-World Latency Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive architectural and benchmark breakdown of the top 4 flagship WiFi 7 networking systems—analyzing 320MHz channel bonding, Multi-Link Operation (MLO) aggregation, Broadcom BCM4916 vs. Qualcomm Networking Pro 1220/1620 processors, 10GbE backhaul throughput, and ultra-low jitter VR/gaming performance.
Read →