Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G: Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 88.6/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G wins 4 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie9595
- CameraXiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G6080
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryXiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G8695
- DisplayXiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G6284
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueXiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G6885
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G has the bigger battery6,330 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) has the bigger screen6.67" vs 6.59"
- Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G wins — BeastScore 88.6/100
After comparing all the specs, Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 88.6 vs top rival 75.2 and Larger battery capacity: 6,330 mAh (+1,330 mAh more).
Significantly faster wired charging: 120W vs max 0W · More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 12GB
Higher overall BeastScore: 88.6 vs top rival 75.2 · Larger battery capacity: 6,330 mAh (+1,330 mAh more)
Common questions
Which is better: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) or Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 88.6/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) (75.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 88.6 vs top rival 75.2 and Larger battery capacity: 6,330 mAh (+1,330 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) and Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G?
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G has a 6.59-inch display and 6330 mAh battery.
How do Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) and Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G compare for speed?
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) scores 95/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G scores 95/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro 5G
POCO F5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P)
POCO F6 vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra 5G
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 23113RKC6G (Xiaomi Vermeer P) vs Galaxy A06
Related articles
All articles →
Hardware PickExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?
ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.
Read →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →





