Android

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SEFull Specs & Is It Worth It?

82.6/ 100
Exceptional
83 / 100
BeastScore
available2026
Buy it if
  • ✓Long battery life — 6,600 mAh
  • ✓120 Hz smooth display
6GB + 128GB
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

Key Specifications

Storage
128 GB
RAM
6 GB
Main Camera
Multi-sensor
Front Camera
Selfie cam
Display
10.1" FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Battery
6,600 mAh

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Quick Answers

What is the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE battery capacity?

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has a 6,600 mAh battery.

How big is the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE screen?

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has a 10.1-inch display (AMOLED, 120Hz).

What processor does the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE use?

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE runs on the Helio G85.

When was the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE released?

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE was released in 2026.

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Full Specifications

Display & Screen
Display TypeAMOLED
Screen Size10.1"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz
BrightnessN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glass
Platform & Performance
Processor / ChipsetHelio G85
CPUMulti-core
GPUIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid
Memory & Storage
RAM6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128 GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed storage
Cameras & Optics
Main Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/A
LiDAR / DepthNone
Selfie Cameraundefined MP
Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity6,600 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNo
Body & Build
DimensionsStandard dimensions
WeightN/A
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal frame
Water & Dust ResistanceNot certified
Connectivity & Ports
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7 / 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+
USBUSB Type-C
NFCYes

Gear for your Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

All Amazon Finds →

Similar Phones

Head-to-Head: Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs the Competition

vs83 – 83

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Galaxy A37 5G

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Pad SE
vs
Galaxy A37 5G
A37 5G
Compare both phones→
vs83 – 83

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Apple iPad mini (2024)

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Pad SE
vs
Apple iPad mini (2024)
mini (2024)
Compare both phones→
vs83 – 82

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Google Pixel 10a 5G

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Pad SE
vs
Google Pixel 10a 5G
10a 5G
Compare both phones→
vs83 – 83

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite (India)

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Pad SE
vs
OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite (India)
Lite (India)
Compare both phones→
vs83 – 83

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Xiaomi Redmi 13x 4G

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Pad SE
vs
Xiaomi Redmi 13x 4G
13x 4G
Compare both phones→
vs83 – 83

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs vivo Y200 Pro

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Pad SE
vs
vivo Y200 Pro
Y200 Pro
Compare both phones→
vs83 – 83

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs A5 Pro

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Pad SE
vs
A5 Pro
A5 Pro
Compare both phones→
vs83 – 82

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Pad SE
vs
Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
5G (2026)
Compare both phones→

Related Articles & Guides

All articles →
DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
14 min read

DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

A 4-way architectural shootout comparing next-gen 1/1.3-inch HDR sensors, 4nm AI silicon, HB-series optical lens mods, 13.5-stop dynamic range, 8K30 capture, 4-hour battery runtimes, and 1.0-inch gimbal vlogging fidelity.

Read more →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read more →
Crucial T705 vs. Samsung 990 PRO vs. WD_BLACK SN850X vs. Kingston FURY Renegade: The Definitive Flagship PCIe 5.0 & Gen 4 NVMe SSD Architecture, Phison E26 vs. Samsung Pascal Silicon, 14,500 MB/s Sequential Throughput, DirectStorage 1.2, Sustained SLC Caching, and Real-World Thermal Throttling Showdown (2026)Flagship SSD Shootout
15 min read

Crucial T705 vs. Samsung 990 PRO vs. WD_BLACK SN850X vs. Kingston FURY Renegade: The Definitive Flagship PCIe 5.0 & Gen 4 NVMe SSD Architecture, Phison E26 vs. Samsung Pascal Silicon, 14,500 MB/s Sequential Throughput, DirectStorage 1.2, Sustained SLC Caching, and Real-World Thermal Throttling Showdown (2026)

We compare and dissect the 2026 flagship NVMe SSD landscape: 12nm Phison PS5026-E26 vs. 8nm Samsung Pascal S4LV008 vs. WD 20-82-20035-B1 controllers, Micron 232-layer vs. Samsung V-NAND V7 TLC, 14,500 MB/s sequential speeds, DirectStorage 1.2 GPU decompression, sustained pSLC write cache endurance, active heatsink thermal dynamics, and real-world gaming IOPS.

Read more →