BeastCompare

80 SE vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

80 SE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 77.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Honor · 2022

80 SE

80 SE
77/ 100
Launch price$399
Motorola · 2023

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
74/ 100
Launch price$999
Head-to-head

80 SE wins 3 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

80 SE
80 SE
3 wins
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
80 SEMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    80
    80
  • Camera80 SE
    84
    72
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieTie
    88
    88
  • Battery80 SE
    78
    58
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    62
    96
  • ConnectivityMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    0
    100
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • Value80 SE
    80
    55
Key differences
  • 80 SE has the bigger battery4,600 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
  • 80 SE has a sharper main camera64 MP vs 12 MP
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.67"
  • 80 SE is lighter175 g vs 184.5 g
  • 80 SE launched cheaper$399 vs $999
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy 80 SE
  • ✓9.5 g lighter (175 g vs 184.5 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$600 cheaper at launch ($399 vs $999)
  • ✓Bigger 4,600 mAh battery (+800 mAh)
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • ✓12 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 165 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specification80 SEMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeNot listedpOLED
Screen Size6.67"6.9"
Resolution & DensityN/A 2640x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh RateNot listed165 Hz
BrightnessN/A1,400 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorDimensity 900 (6nm)Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsMali-G68 MC4Adreno 730
Operating SystemAndroid Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal StorageN/A256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 80 SE Wins Camera
Primary Camera64 MP12 MP, f/1.7, OIS
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/A13 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP32 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 80 SE Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A170.8 x 74 x 7.1 mm
Weight175 g184.5 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP52
8. Battery & Charging🏆 80 SE Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,600 mAh3,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A30W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed5W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothNot listed5.3
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$399$999
Our verdict

80 SE wins — BeastScore 77.0/100

The 80 SE is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (4,600 mAh vs 3,800 mAh) and sharper main camera (64 MP vs 12 MP). The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.67").

Buy 80 SE if you want

Larger battery: 4,600 mAh vs 3,800 mAh · Higher-resolution main camera: 64 MP vs 12 MP

Buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Common questions

Which is better: 80 SE or Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

The 80 SE is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (4,600 mAh vs 3,800 mAh) and sharper main camera (64 MP vs 12 MP). The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.67"). BeastScore: 80 SE 77.0/100, Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 74.3/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between 80 SE and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

80 SE has a 6.67-inch display and 4600 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery.

How do 80 SE and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra compare for speed?

80 SE scores 80/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

SM-S901B/DS Galaxy S22 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE EU 128GB
Samsung

SM-S901B/DS Galaxy S22 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE EU 128GB

iPhone 17
Apple

iPhone 17

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 1TB GU0NP (Google Rango)
Google

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 1TB GU0NP (Google Rango)

OnePlus Ace 3 Pro 5G Porcelain Collector Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJX110 (BBK Corvette)
Oneplus

OnePlus Ace 3 Pro 5G Porcelain Collector Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJX110 (BBK Corvette)

Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi 15S Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25042PN24C (Xiaomi Dijun)

V27
Vivo

V27

OPPO F35 Pro
Oppo

OPPO F35 Pro

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Honor 60 SE vs 80 SE

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

80 SE vs SM-S901B/DS Galaxy S22 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE EU 128GB

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

Compare →
vs

80 SE vs iPhone 17

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro

Compare →
vs

80 SE vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 1TB GU0NP (Google Rango)

Compare →

Gear for the 80 SE

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →