ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro vs vivo X200 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo X200 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 90.9/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Asus · 2024

ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro

ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro
91/ 100
Launch price$1,199
Vivo · 2024

vivo X200 Pro

vivo X200 Pro
91/ 100
Launch price$899
Head-to-head

vivo X200 Pro wins 2 of 8 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro
ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro
1 win
vivo X200 Pro
vivo X200 Pro
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
ASUS ROG Phone 8 Provivo X200 Pro
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    95
    95
  • CameraTie
    91
    91
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieTie
    88
    88
  • Batteryvivo X200 Pro
    94
    98
  • DisplayASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro
    100
    90
  • ConnectivityTie
    95
    95
  • SecurityTie
    100
    100
  • Valuevivo X200 Pro
    55
    68
Key differences
  • vivo X200 Pro has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh
  • vivo X200 Pro charges faster90W vs 65W
  • ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • vivo X200 Pro is lighter223 g vs 225 g
  • vivo X200 Pro launched cheaper$899 vs $1,199
  • ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro has more RAM24 GB vs 16 GB
  • vivo X200 Pro has the faster chipMediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  • vivo X200 Pro is better protected from water and dustIP69 vs IP68
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.78" display at 165 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo X200 Pro
  • ✓2 g lighter (223 g vs 225 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$300 cheaper at launch ($899 vs $1,199)
  • ✓Bigger 6,000 mAh battery (+500 mAh)

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationASUS ROG Phone 8 Provivo X200 Pro
1. Display & Screen🏆 ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Screen Size6.78"6.78"
Resolution & Density2400x1080 (391 ppi)2800x1260 (452 ppi)
Refresh Rate165 Hz120 Hz adaptive
Brightness2,500 nits peak4,500 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm)MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (3nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 750Immortalis-G925 MC12
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory24 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512GB / 1024GB256GB / 512GB / 1024GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, Sony IMX89050 MP, f/1.57, OIS, Sony LYT-818
Telephoto Zoom32 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4200 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.67, OIS
Ultrawide Camera13 MP, f/2.250 MP, f/2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/2.4532 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 vivo X200 Pro Lightest Chassis
Dimensions163.8 x 76.8 x 8.9 mm162.4 x 75.8 x 8.2 mm
Weight225 g223 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68IP69
8. Battery & Charging🏆 vivo X200 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,500 mAh6,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging65W wired fast charging90W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging15W wireless charging30W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,199$899
Our verdict

vivo X200 Pro wins — BeastScore 90.9/100

The vivo X200 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh) and faster charging (90W vs 65W). The ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).

Buy ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro if you want

Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz · More RAM: 24 GB vs 16 GB

Buy vivo X200 Pro if you want

Larger battery: 6,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh · Faster wired charging: 90W vs 65W

Common questions

Which is better: ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro or vivo X200 Pro?

The vivo X200 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh) and faster charging (90W vs 65W). The ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro is worth a look if you prefer its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). BeastScore: ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro 90.8/100, vivo X200 Pro 90.9/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro and vivo X200 Pro?

ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro has a 6.78-inch display and 5500 mAh battery. vivo X200 Pro has a 6.78-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.

How do ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro and vivo X200 Pro compare for speed?

ASUS ROG Phone 8 Pro scores 95/100 for performance; vivo X200 Pro scores 95/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the vivo X200 Pro

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We compared the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →
TP-Link Deco BE85 vs. ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro vs. Netgear Orbi 970 vs. Amazon eero Max 7: The Definitive Flagship WiFi 7 Mesh & Gaming Router Architecture, 320MHz Channels, 4K-QAM, Multi-Link Operation (MLO), 10Gbps Multi-Gig WAN/LAN, Broadcom vs. Qualcomm Silicon, and Real-World Latency Showdown (2026)Flagship WiFi 7 Shootout
18 min read

TP-Link Deco BE85 vs. ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro vs. Netgear Orbi 970 vs. Amazon eero Max 7: The Definitive Flagship WiFi 7 Mesh & Gaming Router Architecture, 320MHz Channels, 4K-QAM, Multi-Link Operation (MLO), 10Gbps Multi-Gig WAN/LAN, Broadcom vs. Qualcomm Silicon, and Real-World Latency Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural and benchmark breakdown of the top 4 flagship WiFi 7 networking systems—analyzing 320MHz channel bonding, Multi-Link Operation (MLO) aggregation, Broadcom BCM4916 vs. Qualcomm Networking Pro 1220/1620 processors, 10GbE backhaul throughput, and ultra-low jitter VR/gaming performance.

Read →