BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) vs Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7): Which One Should You Buy?
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)9095
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryBBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A)7870
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) has the bigger battery4,700 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
- BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) has the bigger screen6.78" vs 6.49"
- BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) is lighter207 g vs 215 g
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AC vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 5G SM8550-AB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) wins — BeastScore 72.3/100
After comparing all the specs, BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,700 mAh (+300 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,700 mAh (+300 mAh more)
More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 12GB
Common questions
Which is better: BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) or Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)?
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.3/100 compared to Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) (72.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,700 mAh (+300 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) and Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)?
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) has a 6.78-inch display and 4700 mAh battery. Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) has a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) and Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) compare for speed?
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) scores 90/100 for performance; Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) scores 95/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
iPhone 16
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Xiaomi Mi 14 Civi 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 24053PY09I (Xiaomi Chenfeng)
BBK Vivo V27e 2023 NFC Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB V2237 (BBK V2237)
Oppo Reno10 Pro+ 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU V3 256GB CPH2521 (BBK 2521)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) vs Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) vs iPhone 16
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs iPhone 16
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Related articles
All articles →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →
Flagship Projector ShootoutHisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.
Read →
Prosumer NAS Flagship ShootoutUGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)
We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.
Read →