BeastCompare

BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 74.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2022

BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)

BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)
74/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Motorola · 2023

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
74/ 100
Launch price$999
Head-to-head

BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)
BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)
3 wins
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedBBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)
    95
    80
  • CameraMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    60
    72
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryBBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)
    78
    58
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    62
    96
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueBBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)
    68
    55
Key differences
  • BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) has the bigger battery4,880 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.78"
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is lighter184.5 g vs 193 g
  • BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) has more RAM16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 MT6896Z/CZA
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)
  • ✓Bigger 4,880 mAh battery (+1,080 mAh)
  • ✓6.78" display
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • ✓8.5 g lighter (184.5 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$9000 cheaper at launch ($999 vs $9999)
  • ✓12 MP main camera

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationBBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeAM-OLED displaypOLED
Screen Size6.78"6.9"
Resolution & Density1080x2400 (388 ppi)2640x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz165 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A1,400 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 8200 MT6896Z/CZA (4nm)Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsARM Mali-G610MP6Adreno 730
Operating SystemAndroid Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary CameraN/A12 MP, f/1.7, OIS
Telephoto ZoomNot listedNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/A13 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNot listedNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/A32 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A170.8 x 74 x 7.1 mm
Weight193 g184.5 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP52
8. Battery & Charging🏆 BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,880 mAh3,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A30W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed5W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothNot listed5.3
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$999
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins — BeastScore 74.3/100

After comparing all the specs, Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 73.5 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.

Buy BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) if you want

Larger battery capacity: 4,880 mAh (+1,080 mAh more) · More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 8GB

Buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 73.5 · Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W

Common questions

Which is better: BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) or Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads with an overall BeastScore of 74.3/100 compared to BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) (73.5/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 73.5 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.

What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) has a 6.78-inch display and 4880 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery.

How do BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra compare for speed?

BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) scores 95/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
Samsung

Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

iPhone 14 Pro
Apple

iPhone 14 Pro

Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)
Google

Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)

OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)
Oneplus

OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)

Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)

BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)

Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)
Oppo

Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

BBK Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2199A (BBK V2199A) vs BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

Compare →
vs

BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) vs iPhone 14 Pro

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro

Compare →
vs

BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →