BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) vs Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701): Which One Should You Buy?
BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 73.5/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedBBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)9580
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryOppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)7892
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) has the bigger battery5,800 mAh vs 4,880 mAh
- BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) has the bigger screen6.78" vs 6.67"
- Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) is lighter192 g vs 193 g
- BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) has more RAM16 GB vs 8 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) wins — BeastScore 73.5/100
After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 73.5 vs top rival 72.6 and More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 8GB.
Higher overall BeastScore: 73.5 vs top rival 72.6 · More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 8GB
Larger battery capacity: 5,800 mAh (+920 mAh more)
Common questions
Which is better: BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) or Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)?
BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) leads with an overall BeastScore of 73.5/100 compared to Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) (72.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 73.5 vs top rival 72.6 and More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 8GB.
What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) and Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)?
BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) has a 6.78-inch display and 4880 mAh battery. Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) has a 6.67-inch display and 5800 mAh battery.
How do BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) and Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) compare for speed?
BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) scores 95/100 for performance; Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
iPhone 14 Pro
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)
BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
BBK Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2199A (BBK V2199A) vs BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A)
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) vs Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) vs Oppo Reno14 F 5G
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) vs Reno13 Pro
BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
BBK Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE 5G TopEdition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2238A (BBK V2238A) vs iPhone 14 Pro
Related articles
All articles →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →
Flagship Projector ShootoutHisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.
Read →
Prosumer NAS Flagship ShootoutUGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)
We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.
Read →