BeastCompare

BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 74.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2022

BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G)

BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G)
67/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Motorola · 2023

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
74/ 100
Launch price$999
Head-to-head

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G)
BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G)
2 wins
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G)Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    64
    80
  • CameraMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    60
    72
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryBBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G)
    86
    58
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    62
    96
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueBBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G)
    68
    55
Key differences
  • BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.51"
  • BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) is lighter179 g vs 184.5 g
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has more RAM8 GB vs 4 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G)
  • ✓5.5 g lighter (179 g), easier to hold
  • ✓Bigger 5,000 mAh battery (+1,200 mAh)
  • ✓6.51" display
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • ✓$9000 cheaper at launch ($999 vs $9999)
  • ✓12 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 165 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationBBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G)Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeColor IPS TFT LCD displaypOLED
Screen Size6.51"6.9"
Resolution & Density720x1600 (270 ppi)2640x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz165 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A1,400 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 680 SM6225 (6nm)Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsQualcomm Adreno 610Adreno 730
Operating SystemAndroid Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory4 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary CameraN/A12 MP, f/1.7, OIS
Telephoto ZoomNot listedNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/A13 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNot listedNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/A32 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A170.8 x 74 x 7.1 mm
Weight179 g184.5 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP52
8. Battery & Charging🏆 BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh3,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A30W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed5W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothNot listed5.3
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$999
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins — BeastScore 74.3/100

After comparing all the specs, Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 67.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.

Buy BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) if you want

Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+1,200 mAh more)

Buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 67.4 · Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W

Common questions

Which is better: BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) or Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads with an overall BeastScore of 74.3/100 compared to BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) (67.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 67.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.

What are the main battery and display differences between BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) has a 6.51-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery.

How do BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra compare for speed?

BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) scores 64/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
Samsung

Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

iPhone 14 Pro
Apple

iPhone 14 Pro

Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)
Google

Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)

OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)
Oneplus

OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)

Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)

BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)

Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)
Oppo

Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) vs Samsung SM-A166U Galaxy A16 5G 2024 Standard Edition TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-A166T (Samsung A166)

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

Compare →
vs

BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) vs iPhone 14

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro

Compare →
vs

BBK vivo iQOO U5x 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2180GA (BBK V2180G) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →