BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro): Which One Should You Buy?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 69.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2024

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
69/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi · 2022

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)
68/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) wins 1 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
1 win
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)
1 win
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedXiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)
    72
    80
  • CameraTie
    60
    60
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryBBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
    86
    70
  • DisplayTie
    62
    62
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    68
    68
Key differences
  • BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) has the bigger screen6.57" vs 6.56"
  • BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) is lighter185 g vs 198 g
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) has the faster chipDimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835T
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
  • ✓13 g lighter (185 g), easier to hold
  • ✓Bigger 5,000 mAh battery (+600 mAh)
  • ✓6.56" display
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)
  • ✓6.57" display at 144 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationBBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeColor IPS TFT LCD displayColor IPS TFT LCD display
Screen Size6.56"6.57"
Resolution & Density720x1612 (269 ppi)1080x2460 (409 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz144 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835T (6nm)Dimensity 8100 (5nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsARM Mali-G57MP2Mali-G610 MC6
Operating SystemAndroid Android 12
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory6 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB128GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary CameraN/AN/A
Telephoto ZoomNot listedNot listed
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNot listedNot listed
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/AN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A163.64 x 74.29 x 8.87 mm
Weight185 g198 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh4,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A67W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listedBluetooth 5.3
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB C reversible
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) wins — BeastScore 69.4/100

After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 69.4 vs top rival 68.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more).

Buy BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 69.4 vs top rival 68.2 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more)

Buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) if you want

Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 0W · Smoother display: 144Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz

Common questions

Which is better: BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) or Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) leads with an overall BeastScore of 69.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) (68.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 69.4 vs top rival 68.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) has a 6.56-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) has a 6.57-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) compare for speed?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) scores 72/100 for performance; Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
ExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?Hardware Pick
9 min read

ExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?

ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)Lab Tested · Monitor Architecture Showdown
18 min read

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)

We benchmarked the top 32-inch 4K 240Hz OLED gaming monitors across Gen 3 QD-OLED color volume, LG Micro Lens Array (MLA+) WOLED dual-mode 480Hz switching, sub-pixel text fringing, thermal dissipation heatsinks, DisplayPort 1.4 DSC vs HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, and 3-year burn-in warranties.

Read →