Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro): Which One Should You Buy?
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 68.2/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) wins 1 of 6 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie8080
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie7070
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityGoogle Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)9065
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) has the bigger battery4,400 mAh vs 4,385 mAh
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) charges faster67W vs 18W
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) has a smoother screen144 Hz vs 90 Hz
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) has the bigger screen6.57" vs 6.1"
- Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) is lighter193.5 g vs 198 g
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) has the faster chipDimensity 8100 vs Google Tensor G2
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) wins — BeastScore 68.2/100
After comparing all the specs, Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher resolution main sensor: 64 MP vs max 0 MP and Brighter screen: 1,000 nits peak vs 0 nits.
Higher resolution main sensor: 64 MP vs max 0 MP · Brighter screen: 1,000 nits peak vs 0 nits
Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 18W · Smoother display: 144Hz refresh rate vs 90Hz
Common questions
Which is better: Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) or Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)?
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) leads with an overall BeastScore of 68.2/100 compared to Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) (68.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher resolution main sensor: 64 MP vs max 0 MP and Brighter screen: 1,000 nits peak vs 0 nits.
What are the main battery and display differences between Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)?
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) has a 6.1-inch display and 4385 mAh battery. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) has a 6.57-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) compare for speed?
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) scores 80/100 for performance; Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4)
Pixel 6a

OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)

Xiaomi Mi 12 Lite 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2203129G (Xiaomi Taoyao)

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)

Oppo Reno 7 A 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 128GB A201OP (BBK 2353)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) vs Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) vs Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4)
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs Pixel 6a
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) vs Pixel 6a
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx) vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro) vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)
Related articles
All articles →
HARDWARE DEEP DIVEAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" Deep Dive: 16 Zen 5 Cores, 40-CU RDNA 3.5, 128GB Unified Memory, and Local LLM Architecture
A complete architectural breakdown of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Strix Halo): 16 full Zen 5 cores, Radeon 8060S with 40 RDNA 3.5 compute units, 128GB unified LPDDR5X-8533 memory, 32MB MALL cache, and local AI benchmarks.
Read →Apple M4 Max & M4 Pro Silicon Deep Dive: 3nm Architecture, 128GB Unified Memory, Thunderbolt 5, and Benchmark Breakdown
An architectural deep dive into Apple's M4 Pro and M4 Max silicon: 2nd-gen 3nm lithography, 546 GB/s memory bandwidth, 2x ray-tracing throughput, Thunderbolt 5, and real-world benchmarks across LLMs, 3D rendering, and video production.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →