BeastCompare

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming vs HONOR X9b: Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming edges ahead with a BeastScore of 90.1/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
90/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Honor · 2024

HONOR X9b

HONOR X9b
90/ 100
Launch price$349
Head-to-head

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
3 wins
HONOR X9b
HONOR X9b
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Xiaomi Black Shark GamingHONOR X9b
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedXiaomi Black Shark Gaming
    95
    90
  • CameraHONOR X9b
    80
    90
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryXiaomi Black Shark Gaming
    95
    92
  • DisplayXiaomi Black Shark Gaming
    94
    88
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueHONOR X9b
    85
    90
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming has the bigger battery7,300 mAh vs 5,800 mAh
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming has the bigger screen8.8" vs 6.78"
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming has the faster chipSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
  • ✓Bigger 7,300 mAh battery (+1,500 mAh)
  • ✓8.8" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy HONOR X9b
  • ✓108 MP main camera
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationXiaomi Black Shark GamingHONOR X9b
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size8.8"6.78"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED 2388x1080 (385 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
BrightnessN/A2,000 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedAdreno 710
Operating SystemAndroid Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256 GB256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 HONOR X9b Wins Camera
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera System108 MP, f/1.75
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/A5 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MP16 MP, f/2.45
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/A165.1 x 76.1 x 7.9 mm
WeightN/A185 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP53
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming Wins Battery
Battery Capacity7,300 mAh5,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast charging35W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 6
BluetoothNot listed5.1
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$349
Our verdict

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming wins — BeastScore 90.1/100

The Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,300 mAh vs 5,800 mAh) and bigger screen (8.8" vs 6.78").

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming if you want

Larger battery: 7,300 mAh vs 5,800 mAh · Larger display: 8.8" vs 6.78"

Buy HONOR X9b if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Common questions

Which is better: Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming or HONOR X9b?

The Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,300 mAh vs 5,800 mAh) and bigger screen (8.8" vs 6.78"). BeastScore: Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming 90.1/100, HONOR X9b 90.0/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming and HONOR X9b?

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming has a 8.8-inch display and 7300 mAh battery. HONOR X9b has a 6.78-inch display and 5800 mAh battery.

How do Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming and HONOR X9b compare for speed?

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming scores 95/100 for performance; HONOR X9b scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro

Apple iPhone 18 Pro
Apple

Apple iPhone 18 Pro

Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G

OnePlus Pad 3 Pro
Oneplus

OnePlus Pad 3 Pro

Xiaomi 18 Pro
Xiaomi

Xiaomi 18 Pro

vivo IQOO Pad5c
Vivo

vivo IQOO Pad5c

Oppo Find N6 5G
Oppo

Oppo Find N6 5G

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Honor X6b vs HONOR X9b

Compare →
vs

Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) vs HONOR X9b

Compare →
vs

HONOR X9b vs Honor X9e Pro

Compare →
vs

HONOR X9b vs Honor X9a

Compare →
vs

HONOR X9b vs Honor X9c Smart

Compare →
vs

HONOR X9b vs POCO X6 Pro

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming vs Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro

Compare →
vs

HONOR X9b vs Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro

Compare →

Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship SoC Architecture
22 min read

Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3nm architectural deep dive comparing Qualcomm custom Oryon CPU, MediaTek All-Big-Core Dimensity 9400, and Apple A18 Pro—covering microarchitecture, Adreno 830 vs Immortalis-G925 ray tracing, NPU compute, thermal throttling, and real-world gaming frame rates.

Read →
TP-Link Deco BE85 vs. ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro vs. Netgear Orbi 970 vs. Amazon eero Max 7: The Definitive Flagship WiFi 7 Mesh & Gaming Router Architecture, 320MHz Channels, 4K-QAM, Multi-Link Operation (MLO), 10Gbps Multi-Gig WAN/LAN, Broadcom vs. Qualcomm Silicon, and Real-World Latency Showdown (2026)Flagship WiFi 7 Shootout
18 min read

TP-Link Deco BE85 vs. ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro vs. Netgear Orbi 970 vs. Amazon eero Max 7: The Definitive Flagship WiFi 7 Mesh & Gaming Router Architecture, 320MHz Channels, 4K-QAM, Multi-Link Operation (MLO), 10Gbps Multi-Gig WAN/LAN, Broadcom vs. Qualcomm Silicon, and Real-World Latency Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural and benchmark breakdown of the top 4 flagship WiFi 7 networking systems—analyzing 320MHz channel bonding, Multi-Link Operation (MLO) aggregation, Broadcom BCM4916 vs. Qualcomm Networking Pro 1220/1620 processors, 10GbE backhaul throughput, and ultra-low jitter VR/gaming performance.

Read →