Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming vs vivo Pad3: Which One Should You Buy?
These two are too close to call on BeastScore — the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
vivo Pad3
Too close to call: 0 of 5 categories each
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie9595
- CameraTie8080
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie9595
- DisplayTie9494
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie8585
- vivo Pad3 has the bigger battery10,000 mAh vs 7,300 mAh
- vivo Pad3 has the bigger screen12.1" vs 8.8"
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming and vivo Pad3 are evenly matched
It's a close call: both phones score almost the same, so pick the one whose design and price suit you.
Reliable all-round performance.
Larger battery: 10,000 mAh vs 7,300 mAh · Larger display: 12.1" vs 8.8"
Common questions
Which is better: Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming or vivo Pad3?
It's a close call: both phones score almost the same, so pick the one whose design and price suit you. BeastScore: Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming 90.1/100, vivo Pad3 90.1/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming and vivo Pad3?
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming has a 8.8-inch display and 7300 mAh battery. vivo Pad3 has a 12.1-inch display and 10000 mAh battery.
How do Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming and vivo Pad3 compare for speed?
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming scores 95/100 for performance; vivo Pad3 scores 95/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
vivo Pad3 vs vivo Pad3 Pro
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming vs Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
vivo Pad3 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming vs Apple iPhone 18 Pro
vivo Pad3 vs Apple iPhone 18 Pro
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming vs Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
vivo Pad3 vs Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming vs OnePlus Pad 3 Pro
Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →
Flagship SoC ArchitectureSnapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3nm architectural deep dive comparing Qualcomm custom Oryon CPU, MediaTek All-Big-Core Dimensity 9400, and Apple A18 Pro—covering microarchitecture, Adreno 830 vs Immortalis-G925 ray tracing, NPU compute, thermal throttling, and real-world gaming frame rates.
Read →
Flagship WiFi 7 ShootoutTP-Link Deco BE85 vs. ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro vs. Netgear Orbi 970 vs. Amazon eero Max 7: The Definitive Flagship WiFi 7 Mesh & Gaming Router Architecture, 320MHz Channels, 4K-QAM, Multi-Link Operation (MLO), 10Gbps Multi-Gig WAN/LAN, Broadcom vs. Qualcomm Silicon, and Real-World Latency Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive architectural and benchmark breakdown of the top 4 flagship WiFi 7 networking systems—analyzing 320MHz channel bonding, Multi-Link Operation (MLO) aggregation, Broadcom BCM4916 vs. Qualcomm Networking Pro 1220/1620 processors, 10GbE backhaul throughput, and ultra-low jitter VR/gaming performance.
Read →