BeastCompare

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming vs Vivo X300 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

These two are too close to call on BeastScore — the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
90/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2025

Vivo X300 Pro

Vivo X300 Pro
90/ 100
Launch price$999
Head-to-head

Too close to call: 2 of 5 categories each

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
2 wins
Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Xiaomi Black Shark GamingVivo X300 Pro
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    95
    95
  • CameraVivo X300 Pro
    80
    91
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryVivo X300 Pro
    95
    98
  • DisplayXiaomi Black Shark Gaming
    94
    90
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueXiaomi Black Shark Gaming
    85
    55
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming has the bigger battery7,300 mAh vs 6,510 mAh
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming has the bigger screen8.8" vs 6.78"
  • Vivo X300 Pro has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Vivo X300 Pro has the faster chipDimensity 9500 vs Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming
  • ✓Bigger 7,300 mAh battery (+790 mAh)
  • ✓8.8" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Vivo X300 Pro
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationXiaomi Black Shark GamingVivo X300 Pro
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Screen Size8.8"6.78"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED 2800x1260 (460 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz adaptive
BrightnessN/A4,500 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 Dimensity 9500 (3nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedMali G1-Ultra
Operating SystemAndroid Android 16
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256 GB256GB / 512GB / 1024GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Vivo X300 Pro Wins Camera
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera System50 MP, f/1.6, OIS, Sony LYT-828
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)200 MP (3.7x optical zoom), f/2.6, OIS
Ultrawide CameraN/A50 MP, f/2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MP50 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/A162.1 x 75.6 x 7.99 mm
WeightN/A226 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP69
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Vivo X300 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity7,300 mAh6,510 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast charging90W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed40W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 7
BluetoothNot listed6.0
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 3.2
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$999
Our verdict

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming and Vivo X300 Pro are evenly matched

It's a close call. Pick the Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming for its bigger battery (7,300 mAh vs 6,510 mAh) and bigger screen (8.8" vs 6.78"), or the Vivo X300 Pro for its more RAM (16 GB vs 12 GB) and faster chip (Dimensity 9500 vs Snapdragon 8s Gen 3).

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming if you want

Larger battery: 7,300 mAh vs 6,510 mAh · Larger display: 8.8" vs 6.78"

Buy Vivo X300 Pro if you want

Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens) · More RAM: 16 GB vs 12 GB

Common questions

Which is better: Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming or Vivo X300 Pro?

It's a close call. Pick the Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming for its bigger battery (7,300 mAh vs 6,510 mAh) and bigger screen (8.8" vs 6.78"), or the Vivo X300 Pro for its more RAM (16 GB vs 12 GB) and faster chip (Dimensity 9500 vs Snapdragon 8s Gen 3). BeastScore: Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming 90.1/100, Vivo X300 Pro 89.6/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming and Vivo X300 Pro?

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming has a 8.8-inch display and 7300 mAh battery. Vivo X300 Pro has a 6.78-inch display and 6510 mAh battery.

How do Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming and Vivo X300 Pro compare for speed?

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming scores 95/100 for performance; Vivo X300 Pro scores 95/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro

Apple iPhone 18 Pro
Apple

Apple iPhone 18 Pro

Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G

OnePlus Pad 3 Pro
Oneplus

OnePlus Pad 3 Pro

Xiaomi 18 Pro
Xiaomi

Xiaomi 18 Pro

vivo IQOO Pad5c
Vivo

vivo IQOO Pad5c

Oppo Find N6 5G
Oppo

Oppo Find N6 5G

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Vivo X300 Pro vs vivo X500 Pro

Compare →
vs

vivo X100 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro

Compare →
vs

vivo X200 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro

Compare →
vs

Vivo X300 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro

Compare →
vs

Vivo X300s vs Vivo X300 Pro

Compare →
vs

Vivo X300 Pro vs vivo X300 FE 5G (Russia)

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming vs Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro

Compare →
vs

Vivo X300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro

Compare →

Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship SoC Architecture
22 min read

Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3nm architectural deep dive comparing Qualcomm custom Oryon CPU, MediaTek All-Big-Core Dimensity 9400, and Apple A18 Pro—covering microarchitecture, Adreno 830 vs Immortalis-G925 ray tracing, NPU compute, thermal throttling, and real-world gaming frame rates.

Read →
TP-Link Deco BE85 vs. ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro vs. Netgear Orbi 970 vs. Amazon eero Max 7: The Definitive Flagship WiFi 7 Mesh & Gaming Router Architecture, 320MHz Channels, 4K-QAM, Multi-Link Operation (MLO), 10Gbps Multi-Gig WAN/LAN, Broadcom vs. Qualcomm Silicon, and Real-World Latency Showdown (2026)Flagship WiFi 7 Shootout
18 min read

TP-Link Deco BE85 vs. ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro vs. Netgear Orbi 970 vs. Amazon eero Max 7: The Definitive Flagship WiFi 7 Mesh & Gaming Router Architecture, 320MHz Channels, 4K-QAM, Multi-Link Operation (MLO), 10Gbps Multi-Gig WAN/LAN, Broadcom vs. Qualcomm Silicon, and Real-World Latency Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural and benchmark breakdown of the top 4 flagship WiFi 7 networking systems—analyzing 320MHz channel bonding, Multi-Link Operation (MLO) aggregation, Broadcom BCM4916 vs. Qualcomm Networking Pro 1220/1620 processors, 10GbE backhaul throughput, and ultra-low jitter VR/gaming performance.

Read →