BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
WHY IS BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | BQ Aquaris | Samsung SM-G1600 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 3,100 mAh | 1,950 mAh | +3,100 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 5" | 3.8" | 5" |
| Chassis Weight | 150g | 160g | 150g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
Frequently Asked Questions: BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Which phone is better: BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB or Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Larger battery capacity: 3,100 mAh (+1,150 mAh more) and Significantly larger display: 5" vs max 3.8" for media & multitasking.
What are the primary battery and display differences between BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB is equipped with a 5-inch display and 3100 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
In lab hardware evaluations, BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) scores 60/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy Folder2

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB vs Galaxy Folder2


Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Galaxy Folder2


BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)


Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)


BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

BQ Aquaris X5 Plus LTE Dual SIM 32GB vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)


Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

