Home/Battles/BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
Lab Benchmark Battle
BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Blackview · 2018
BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US BETTER THAN Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE USWinner 🏆
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | BV6800 Pro | Samsung SM-F966D | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 6,580 mAh | 4,400 mAh | +6,580 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 15.9 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 5.7" | 6.49" | 6.49" |
| Chassis Weight | 275g | 215g | 215g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 68/100 camera rating.
When to buy BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US:
Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 · Larger battery capacity: 6,580 mAh (+2,180 mAh more)
When to buy Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7):
Significantly larger display: 6.49" vs max 5.7" for media & multitasking · More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 4GB
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
Which phone is better: BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US or Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)?
BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) (70.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 and Larger battery capacity: 6,580 mAh (+2,180 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US and Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)?
BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US is equipped with a 5.7-inch display and 6580 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) features a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US and Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)?
In lab hardware evaluations, BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US scores 68/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Score: 71/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Score: 70/100
Google · 2025
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Score: 71/100
Oneplus · 2023
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
Score: 71/100
Xiaomi · 2025
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
Score: 71/100
Vivo · 2024
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
Score: 71/100
Oppo · 2024
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
Score: 71/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #171 vs 71
BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
V/S
Battle #271 vs 71
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
V/S
Battle #371 vs 70
BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #471 vs 70
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #571 vs 71
BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
V/S
Battle #671 vs 71
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
V/S
Battle #771 vs 71
BV6800 Pro Dual SIM LTE US vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
V/S
Battle #871 vs 71
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
V/S