Camon 30S vs SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
WHY IS SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q BETTER THAN Camon 30S?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Camon 30S | SM-F916J Galaxy | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,200 mAh | 4,500 mAh | +5,200 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | 25W | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 50 MP | 12.2 MP | 50 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.8" | 6.22" | 6.8" |
| Chassis Weight | 198g | 282g | 198g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q edges ahead with a BeastScore of 79.1/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 68/100 camera rating.
Frequently Asked Questions: Camon 30S vs SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
Which phone is better: Camon 30S or SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q?
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q leads with an overall BeastScore of 79.1/100 compared to Camon 30S (78.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 79.1 vs top rival 78.6 and Significantly faster wired charging: 25W vs max 0W.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Camon 30S and SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q?
Camon 30S is equipped with a 6.8-inch display and 5200 mAh battery, while SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q features a 6.22-inch display and 4500 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between Camon 30S and SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q?
In lab hardware evaluations, Camon 30S scores 84/100 in camera performance, while SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q scores 68/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)

Apple iPad (2025)
Pixel 8a

OnePlus Nord N20 SE

Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India)

vivo T3 Lite

A80

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Camon 30S vs Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)


SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)


Camon 30S vs Apple iPhone SE (2022)


SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Apple iPad (2025)


Camon 30S vs Pixel 8a

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Pixel 8a

Camon 30S vs OnePlus Nord N20 SE


SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs OnePlus Nord N20 SE

