Galaxy A16 5G vs Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE: Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 77.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE wins 3 of 8 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedXiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE6480
- CameraTie8484
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieXiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE6076
- BatteryGalaxy A16 5G8670
- DisplayTie7474
- ConnectivityXiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE5770
- SecurityTie3434
- ValueGalaxy A16 5G9080
- Galaxy A16 5G has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,250 mAh
- Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE charges faster33W vs 25W
- Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE has a sharper main camera64 MP vs 50 MP
- Galaxy A16 5G has the bigger screen6.7" vs 6.55"
- Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE is lighter158 g vs 200 g
- Galaxy A16 5G launched cheaper$199 vs $399
- Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE has a sharper selfie camera20 MP vs 13 MP
- Galaxy A16 5G has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.2
- Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE has more RAM8 GB vs 4 GB
- Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5
- Galaxy A16 5G is better protected from water and dustIP54 vs IP53
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE wins — BeastScore 77.8/100
The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster charging (33W vs 25W) and sharper main camera (64 MP vs 50 MP). The Galaxy A16 5G is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,250 mAh).
Larger battery: 5,000 mAh vs 4,250 mAh · Lower launch price: $199 vs $399
Higher-resolution main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP · More RAM: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Common questions
Which is better: Galaxy A16 5G or Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE?
The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster charging (33W vs 25W) and sharper main camera (64 MP vs 50 MP). The Galaxy A16 5G is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,250 mAh). BeastScore: Galaxy A16 5G 78.0/100, Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE 77.8/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy A16 5G and Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE?
Galaxy A16 5G has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE has a 6.55-inch display and 4250 mAh battery.
How do Galaxy A16 5G and Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE compare for speed?
Galaxy A16 5G scores 64/100 for performance; Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Galaxy A16 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A18
Galaxy A16 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) vs Galaxy A16 5G
Galaxy A15 5G vs Galaxy A16 5G
Galaxy A16 5G vs CMF Phone 1
Galaxy A16 5G vs P1 5G
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE vs Galaxy A15 5G
Galaxy A16 5G vs iPhone Air
Gear for the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep DiveIntel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →





