BeastCompare

Galaxy A57 5G vs OnePlus Pad Lite: Which One Should You Buy?

OnePlus Pad Lite edges ahead with a BeastScore of 85.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2026

Galaxy A57 5G

Galaxy A57 5G
85/ 100
Launch price$549
OnePlus

OnePlus Pad Lite

OnePlus Pad Lite
85/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

OnePlus Pad Lite wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy A57 5G
Galaxy A57 5G
2 wins
OnePlus Pad Lite
OnePlus Pad Lite
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Galaxy A57 5GOnePlus Pad Lite
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGalaxy A57 5G
    80
    79
  • CameraGalaxy A57 5G
    88
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryOnePlus Pad Lite
    86
    95
  • DisplayOnePlus Pad Lite
    88
    94
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueOnePlus Pad Lite
    80
    85
Key differences
  • OnePlus Pad Lite has the bigger battery9,340 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • OnePlus Pad Lite has the bigger screen11" vs 6.7"
  • Galaxy A57 5G has the faster chipExynos 1680 vs Helio G100
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy A57 5G
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.7" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy OnePlus Pad Lite
  • ✓Bigger 9,340 mAh battery (+4,340 mAh)
  • ✓11" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy A57 5GOnePlus Pad Lite
1. Display & Screen🏆 OnePlus Pad Lite Wins Display
Screen typeSuper AMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.7"11"
Resolution & Density2340x1080 (385 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
Brightness1,900 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy A57 5G Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorExynos 1680 (4nm)Helio G100
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsXclipse 550Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 16Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB / 256GB128 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy A57 5G Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.8, OISundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera8 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens12 MP, f/2.2undefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
Dimensions161.7 x 76.7 x 6.9 mmN/A
Weight179 gN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP67Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 OnePlus Pad Lite Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh9,340 mAh
Wired Fast Charging45W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6Not listed
Bluetooth5.3Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0Not listed
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$549Price on request
Our verdict

OnePlus Pad Lite wins — BeastScore 85.3/100

The OnePlus Pad Lite is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (9,340 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (11" vs 6.7"). The Galaxy A57 5G is worth a look if you prefer its faster chip (Exynos 1680 vs Helio G100).

Buy Galaxy A57 5G if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Buy OnePlus Pad Lite if you want

Larger battery: 9,340 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · Larger display: 11" vs 6.7"

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy A57 5G or OnePlus Pad Lite?

The OnePlus Pad Lite is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (9,340 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (11" vs 6.7"). The Galaxy A57 5G is worth a look if you prefer its faster chip (Exynos 1680 vs Helio G100). BeastScore: Galaxy A57 5G 84.8/100, OnePlus Pad Lite 85.3/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy A57 5G and OnePlus Pad Lite?

Galaxy A57 5G has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. OnePlus Pad Lite has a 11-inch display and 9340 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy A57 5G and OnePlus Pad Lite compare for speed?

Galaxy A57 5G scores 80/100 for performance; OnePlus Pad Lite scores 79/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G

Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)
Apple

Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G

OnePlus Nord CE5 5G
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord CE5 5G

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro

vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
Vivo

vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro

Oppo A5 Energy
Oppo

Oppo A5 Energy

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Edge 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Galaxy A55 5G vs Galaxy A57 5G

Compare →
vs

Galaxy A56 vs Galaxy A57 5G

Compare →
vs

POCO F7 Pro vs Galaxy A57 5G

Compare →
vs

Galaxy A57 5G vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

Compare →
vs

Galaxy A57 5G vs OnePlus 13R

Compare →
vs

Galaxy A57 5G vs iPhone 17e

Compare →
vs

Galaxy A57 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G

Compare →
vs

OnePlus Pad Lite vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G

Compare →

Gear for the OnePlus Pad Lite

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →