Galaxy Fold 5G vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 74.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2019

Galaxy Fold 5G

Galaxy Fold 5G
73/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Motorola · 2023

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
74/ 100
Launch price$999
Head-to-head

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins overall; Galaxy Fold 5G takes 4 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy Fold 5G
Galaxy Fold 5G
4 wins
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
Galaxy Fold 5GMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGalaxy Fold 5G
    90
    80
  • CameraMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    68
    72
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    40
    88
  • BatteryGalaxy Fold 5G
    70
    58
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    62
    96
  • ConnectivityGalaxy Fold 5G
    84
    72
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueGalaxy Fold 5G
    68
    55
Key differences
  • Galaxy Fold 5G has the bigger battery4,235 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
  • Galaxy Fold 5G has the bigger screen7.3" vs 6.9"
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is lighter184.5 g vs 263 g
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5
  • Galaxy Fold 5G has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Fold 5G
  • ✓Bigger 4,235 mAh battery (+435 mAh)
  • ✓12 MP main camera
  • ✓7.3" display
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • ✓78.5 g lighter (184.5 g vs 263 g), easier to hold
  • ✓12 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 165 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy Fold 5GMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorspOLED
Screen Size7.3"6.9"
Resolution & Density1536x2152 (362 ppi)2640x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh RateNot listed165 Hz
BrightnessN/A1,400 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy Fold 5G Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorNot listed Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedAdreno 730
Operating SystemAndroid Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage12GB / 512GB256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera12 MP12 MP, f/1.7, OIS
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/A13 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens10 MP32 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A170.8 x 74 x 7.1 mm
Weight263 g184.5 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP52
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Galaxy Fold 5G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,235 mAh3,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A30W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed5W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspotWi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.3
USB Port & Speed3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connectorUSB-C 2.0
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$999
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins — BeastScore 74.3/100

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its lighter body (184.5 g vs 263 g) and sharper selfie camera (32 MP vs 10 MP). The Galaxy Fold 5G is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (4,235 mAh vs 3,800 mAh).

Buy Galaxy Fold 5G if you want

Larger battery: 4,235 mAh vs 3,800 mAh · More RAM: 12 GB vs 8 GB

Buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra if you want

Lighter: 184.5 g vs 263 g (79 g less)

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy Fold 5G or Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its lighter body (184.5 g vs 263 g) and sharper selfie camera (32 MP vs 10 MP). The Galaxy Fold 5G is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (4,235 mAh vs 3,800 mAh). BeastScore: Galaxy Fold 5G 72.7/100, Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 74.3/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy Fold 5G and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

Galaxy Fold 5G has a 7.3-inch display and 4235 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy Fold 5G and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra compare for speed?

Galaxy Fold 5G scores 90/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →