BeastCompare

Galaxy Fold vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 74.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2019

Galaxy Fold

Galaxy Fold
73/ 100
Launch price$1,980
Motorola · 2023

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
74/ 100
Launch price$999
Head-to-head

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins overall; Galaxy Fold takes 3 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy Fold
Galaxy Fold
3 wins
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
Galaxy FoldMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGalaxy Fold
    90
    80
  • CameraGalaxy Fold
    75
    72
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    40
    88
  • BatteryGalaxy Fold
    70
    58
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    62
    96
  • ConnectivityTie
    75
    75
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    55
    55
Key differences
  • Galaxy Fold has the bigger battery4,380 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra charges faster30W vs 15W
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Galaxy Fold has the bigger screen7.3" vs 6.9"
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is lighter184.5 g vs 263 g
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra launched cheaper$999 vs $1,980
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5
  • Galaxy Fold has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Fold
  • ✓Bigger 4,380 mAh battery (+580 mAh)
  • ✓12 MP main camera
  • ✓7.3" display at 60 Hz
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • ✓78.5 g lighter (184.5 g vs 263 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$981 cheaper at launch ($999 vs $1,980)
  • ✓12 MP main camera

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy FoldMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeDynamic AMOLED (foldable)pOLED
Screen Size7.3"6.9"
Resolution & Density2152x1536 (362 ppi)2640x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz165 Hz
Brightness420 nits peak1,400 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy Fold Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorNot listed Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedAdreno 730
Operating SystemAndroid 9Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512GB256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy Fold Wins Camera
Primary Camera12 MP, f/1.5, OIS12 MP, f/1.7, OIS
Telephoto Zoom12 MP (2x optical zoom), f/2.4, OISNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera16 MP, f/2.213 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens10 MP, f/2.232 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Lightest Chassis
Dimensions160.9 x 117.9 x 6.9 mm170.8 x 74 x 7.1 mm
Weight263 g184.5 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP52
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Galaxy Fold Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,380 mAh3,800 mAh
Wired Fast Charging15W wired fast charging30W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging9W wireless charging5W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.05.3
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.1USB-C 2.0
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,980$999
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins — BeastScore 74.3/100

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster charging (30W vs 15W) and smoother screen (165 Hz vs 60 Hz). The Galaxy Fold is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (4,380 mAh vs 3,800 mAh).

Buy Galaxy Fold if you want

Larger battery: 4,380 mAh vs 3,800 mAh · Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens)

Buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra if you want

Faster wired charging: 30W vs 15W · Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy Fold or Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its faster charging (30W vs 15W) and smoother screen (165 Hz vs 60 Hz). The Galaxy Fold is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (4,380 mAh vs 3,800 mAh). BeastScore: Galaxy Fold 73.2/100, Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 74.3/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy Fold and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

Galaxy Fold has a 7.3-inch display and 4380 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy Fold and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra compare for speed?

Galaxy Fold scores 90/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
Samsung

Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

iPhone 14 Pro
Apple

iPhone 14 Pro

Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)
Google

Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)

OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)
Oneplus

OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)

Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)

BBK Vivo Y100i 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2279A (BBK V2279A)
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y100i 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2279A (BBK V2279A)

Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)
Oppo

Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Fold vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Fold vs iPhone 13 Pro Max

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Fold vs Google Pixel 9 Pro 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB GWVK6 (Google Caiman)

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)

Compare →

Gear for the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →