BeastCompare

Galaxy Folder2 vs Motorola Razr (2019): Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr (2019) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 64.5/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2017

Galaxy Folder2

Galaxy Folder2
61/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Motorola · 2020

Motorola Razr (2019)

Motorola Razr (2019)
65/ 100
Launch price$1,500
Head-to-head

Motorola Razr (2019) wins 3 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy Folder2
Galaxy Folder2
1 win
Motorola Razr (2019)
Motorola Razr (2019)
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
Galaxy Folder2Motorola Razr (2019)
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedMotorola Razr (2019)
    60
    72
  • CameraMotorola Razr (2019)
    60
    68
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieTie
    40
    40
  • BatteryTie
    58
    58
  • DisplayTie
    62
    62
  • ConnectivityMotorola Razr (2019)
    40
    55
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueGalaxy Folder2
    68
    55
Key differences
  • Motorola Razr (2019) has the bigger battery2,510 mAh vs 1,950 mAh
  • Motorola Razr (2019) has a sharper main camera16 MP vs 8 MP
  • Motorola Razr (2019) has the bigger screen6.2" vs 3.8"
  • Galaxy Folder2 is lighter165 g vs 205 g
  • Motorola Razr (2019) has newer Bluetooth5 vs 4.2
  • Motorola Razr (2019) has more RAM6 GB vs 2 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Folder2
  • ✓40 g lighter (165 g vs 205 g), easier to hold
  • ✓8 MP main camera
  • ✓3.8" display
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr (2019)
  • ✓Bigger 2,510 mAh battery (+560 mAh)
  • ✓16 MP main camera
  • ✓6.2" display at 60 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy Folder2Motorola Razr (2019)
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeTFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorsP-OLED (foldable)
Screen Size3.8"6.2"
Resolution & Density480x800 (246 ppi)2142x876 (373 ppi)
Refresh RateNot listed60 Hz
BrightnessN/A450 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Motorola Razr (2019) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorNot listed Not listed
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid Android 9
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory2 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage2GB / 16GB128GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr (2019) Wins Camera
Primary Camera8 MP16 MP, f/1.7
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens5 MP5 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Galaxy Folder2 Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A172 x 72 x 6.9 mm
Weight165 g205 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity1,950 mAh2,510 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A15W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, WiFi Direct, hotspotWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LE5.0
USB Port & SpeedmicroUSB 2.0USB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$1,500
Our verdict

Motorola Razr (2019) wins — BeastScore 64.5/100

The Motorola Razr (2019) is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (2,510 mAh vs 1,950 mAh) and sharper main camera (16 MP vs 8 MP). The Galaxy Folder2 is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (165 g vs 205 g).

Buy Galaxy Folder2 if you want

Lighter: 165 g vs 205 g (40 g less)

Buy Motorola Razr (2019) if you want

Larger battery: 2,510 mAh vs 1,950 mAh · Larger display: 6.2" vs 3.8"

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy Folder2 or Motorola Razr (2019)?

The Motorola Razr (2019) is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (2,510 mAh vs 1,950 mAh) and sharper main camera (16 MP vs 8 MP). The Galaxy Folder2 is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (165 g vs 205 g). BeastScore: Galaxy Folder2 60.8/100, Motorola Razr (2019) 64.5/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy Folder2 and Motorola Razr (2019)?

Galaxy Folder2 has a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery. Motorola Razr (2019) has a 6.2-inch display and 2510 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy Folder2 and Motorola Razr (2019) compare for speed?

Galaxy Folder2 scores 60/100 for performance; Motorola Razr (2019) scores 72/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy S9
Samsung

Galaxy S9

iPhone 13
Apple

iPhone 13

Pixel 3
Google

Pixel 3

OnePlus One
Oneplus

OnePlus One

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB

Oppo A55s 2022 5G TD-LTE JP 64GB A102OP (BBK 2309)
Oppo

Oppo A55s 2022 5G TD-LTE JP 64GB A102OP (BBK 2309)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Galaxy Folder2 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr (2019) vs Galaxy S9

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Folder2 vs iPhone 6

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr (2019) vs iPhone 13

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Folder2 vs Pixel

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr (2019) vs Pixel 3

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Folder2 vs OnePlus One

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr (2019) vs OnePlus One

Compare →

Gear for the Motorola Razr (2019)

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →