Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G: Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.6/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G wins 3 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedGalaxy S20 Ultra9086
- CameraGalaxy S20 Ultra9780
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryXiaomi 17T Pro 5G8695
- DisplayXiaomi 17T Pro 5G8689
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueXiaomi 17T Pro 5G5585
- Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G has the bigger battery7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Galaxy S20 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.83"
- Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G wins — BeastScore 86.6/100
The Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and more RAM (16 GB vs 12 GB). The Galaxy S20 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.83").
Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens)
Larger battery: 7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · More RAM: 16 GB vs 12 GB
Common questions
Which is better: Galaxy S20 Ultra or Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G?
The Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and more RAM (16 GB vs 12 GB). The Galaxy S20 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.83"). BeastScore: Galaxy S20 Ultra 86.7/100, Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G 86.6/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy S20 Ultra and Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G?
Galaxy S20 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G has a 6.83-inch display and 7000 mAh battery.
How do Galaxy S20 Ultra and Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G compare for speed?
Galaxy S20 Ultra scores 90/100 for performance; Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G scores 86/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Xiaomi 13T Pro vs Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G
Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G
Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China) vs Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G
Xiaomi 17 vs Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G
Xiaomi 17T 5G vs Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G
Xiaomi 17 Max 5G vs Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G
Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Gear for the Xiaomi 17T Pro 5G
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep DiveIntel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →





