Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15: Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi 15 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 87.6/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi 15 wins 3 of 8 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie9090
- CameraGalaxy S26 Ultra10091
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieXiaomi 156088
- BatteryXiaomi 158688
- DisplayTie9090
- ConnectivityGalaxy S26 Ultra10088
- SecurityTie100100
- ValueXiaomi 155568
- Xiaomi 15 has the bigger battery5,240 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Xiaomi 15 charges faster90W vs 60W
- Galaxy S26 Ultra has a sharper main camera200 MP vs 50 MP
- Galaxy S26 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.36"
- Xiaomi 15 is lighter191 g vs 214 g
- Xiaomi 15 launched cheaper$899 vs $1,299
- Xiaomi 15 has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP
- Galaxy S26 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi 15 wins — BeastScore 87.6/100
The Xiaomi 15 is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (5,240 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and faster charging (90W vs 60W). The Galaxy S26 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its sharper main camera (200 MP vs 50 MP).
Higher-resolution main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP · Optical telephoto zoom (2 telephoto lenses)
Larger battery: 5,240 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · Faster wired charging: 90W vs 60W
Common questions
Which is better: Galaxy S26 Ultra or Xiaomi 15?
The Xiaomi 15 is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (5,240 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and faster charging (90W vs 60W). The Galaxy S26 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its sharper main camera (200 MP vs 50 MP). BeastScore: Galaxy S26 Ultra 88.2/100, Xiaomi 15 87.6/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy S26 Ultra and Xiaomi 15?
Galaxy S26 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi 15 has a 6.36-inch display and 5240 mAh battery.
How do Galaxy S26 Ultra and Xiaomi 15 compare for speed?
Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 90/100 for performance; Xiaomi 15 scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Galaxy S27 Ultra
Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Galaxy S26 Ultra
Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Galaxy S26 Ultra
Galaxy S26+ vs Galaxy S26 Ultra
Galaxy S26 vs Galaxy S26 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE 5G vs Galaxy S26 Ultra
Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 17
Xiaomi 13 vs Xiaomi 15
Gear for the Xiaomi 15
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep DiveIntel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →





