Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China): Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China)
Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China) wins 2 of 3 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. "From specs" scores compare only the specs both phones list. How we score
- Speedfrom specsXiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China)9098
- CameraNot enough data
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- Batteryfrom specsXiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China)62100
- Displayfrom specsTie8888
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueNot enough data
- Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China) has the bigger battery6,800 mAh vs 4,850 mAh
- Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China) has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.3"
- Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China) has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Google Tensor G6
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China) wins — BeastScore 89.3/100
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China) is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,800 mAh vs 4,850 mAh) and bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.3").
Reliable all-round performance.
Larger battery: 6,800 mAh vs 4,850 mAh · Larger display: 6.9" vs 6.3"
Common questions
Which is better: Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G or Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China) is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,800 mAh vs 4,850 mAh) and bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.3"). BeastScore: Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G 89.0/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China) 89.3/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G and Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China)?
Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G has a 6.3-inch display and 4850 mAh battery. Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China) has a 6.9-inch display and 6800 mAh battery.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Pixel 9 Pro vs Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
Pixel 10 Pro vs Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G vs Google Pixel 11 5G
Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G vs Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G
OnePlus 13s vs Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
Xiaomi 14 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China)
Gear for the Xiaomi 17 Ultra 5G (China)
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep DiveIntel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →